Friday, November 30, 2007

Hirsi Ali debates...

A couple of really great debates where Hirsi Ali takes on her critics and defenders of Islamic Totalitarianism.

Debate: Ayaan Hirsi Ali vs Ed Husain
http://richarddawkins.net/article,1936,Debate-Ayaan-Hirsi-Ali-vs-Ed-Husain,Centre-for-Social-Cohesion
Also here:
http://www.socialcohesion.co.uk/audio/Event201107.mp3


On The Map with Avi Lewis: Ayaan Hirsi Ali & Islamophobia
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08EYqwyns-k&eurl=http://americastruthforum.com/commentary.htm


Sam Harris, also a liberal like Hirsi Ali, warns about the growing threat of Islam to human freedoms.
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=tucker+sam+harris&sitesearch=



Muslim Youth Riots/Burnings/Shootings in France are Organized by Muslim Brotherhood

I warned several years back, that the so-called "spontaneous riots" in France where thousands of infidel cars and businesses were burned down, with scattered knifings and bus-burnings, were organized by the mullahs and the mosques.  Like the "spontaneous" riots in Israel, they were pre-planned months in advance, just waiting for the right excuses to be launched -- in both cases in France, it was the deaths of teenage boys -- electrocuted after touching high voltage equipment or crashing their motorcycle -- which were then wrongly blamed upon the police.  One could see this clearly by the shouts of "Allahua Akbar" from the "youths" who were being led around by older men, by the too-quick and organized acquisition of Molotov bombs, and by how the mullahs and "youth leaders" had positioned themselves as "mediators" to "calm down the situation".  What they demanded, and basically got, was agreements from the police to "stay out of Muslim neighborhoods", thereby ceding territory from sovereign French territory into the international Muslim "umma", as controlled by underground networks with allegiances to the Muslim Brotherhood and other terror groups.  Here is an article citing from captured documents which speak to this process of deliberated slow demographic conquest, punctuated with deliberated violence.

As I've said repeatedly:

The Mullahs are the Generals, and the Mosques are the Propaganda Ministries and Military Headquarters.

James DeMeo


++++++++

Go to the original item to access the various weblinks.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=20FFE708-EE41-4BC5-8852-DA5248EA086D

The Parisian Intifada and "The Project"
 
By Patrick Poole
FrontPageMagazine.com | Thursday, November 29, 2007
Paris is burning, yet again. The Muslim immigrant "youths" in the banlieues have taken to the streets to expand a Western front in the global jihad. This time, however, instead of just burning cars and throwing rocks, this week they have taken up arms against French police. As the Associated Press reported on the violence around Paris late Tuesday, noting the escalation beyond the car-burning intifada of November 2005, such that even apologetic Associated Press reporters are forced to describe the present rioters as "urban guerillas":

Youths rampaged for a third night in the tough suburbs north of Paris and violence spread to a southern city late Tuesday as police struggled to contain rioters who have burned cars and buildings and - in an ominous turn - shot at officers.

A senior police union official warned that "urban guerrillas" had joined the unrest, saying the violence was worse than during three weeks of rioting that raged around French cities in 2005, when firearms were rarely used.

The urban warfare we are seeing in Paris, as well as the systematic violence by Muslim immigrants in other major cities throughout Europe, are in accord with the strategic planning documents drafted by the Muslim Brotherhood in recent decades in their hopes to establish a global caliphate through jihad.

Here I want to examine these recent events in light of the strategy articulated in two of these planning documents, one focusing generally on the West written in the early 1980s, and another elaborating on their "Civilization-Jihadist Process" developed in the 1990s. This process of confrontation also reflects a traditional Islamic view of constant warfare, muqawama, interspersed with temporary truces, hudna, to regroup for further conflict - a doctrine of warfare adopted by the Muslim Brotherhood.

In May 2006,
I introduced FrontPage readers to one such Muslim Brotherhood document known in Western counterintelligence circles as "The Project". FrontPage readers were the first to read the entire document in English translation, obtained during a December 2001 raid on the compound of Yousef Nada, a primary international Muslim Brotherhood figure and financier.

The document is self-dated December 1982, around the time that the Muslim Brotherhood was engaged in a comprehensive organizational reworking. During this period it was determined that rather than continuing confrontation with the Arab nationalist regimes in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood would direct their efforts elsewhere, particularly Europe, and later, the United States.

In fact, in
my introduction to "The Project", I noted the connection between this strategic planning document and the November 2005 French intifada, as well as other contemporary events in Europe:

What makes The Project so different from the standard "Death of America! Death to Israel!" and "Establish the global caliphate!" Islamist rhetoric is that it represents a flexible, multi-phased, long-term approach to the "cultural invasion" of the West. Calling for the utilization of various tactics, ranging from immigration, infiltration, surveillance, propaganda, protest, deception, political legitimacy and terrorism, The Project has served for more than two decades as the Muslim Brotherhood "master plan". As can be seen in a number of examples throughout Europe - including the political recognition of parallel Islamist government organizations in Sweden, the recent "cartoon" jihad in Denmark, the Parisian car-burning intifada last November, and the 7/7 terrorist attacks in London - the plan outlined in The Project has been overwhelmingly successful.

The strategic plan outlined within "The Project" specifically directs the connection of Muslim minorities in the West with the global jihadist movements elsewhere in the world as the sole "suggested mission" under the document's "Ninth Point of Departure":

<quote>
THE NINTH POINT OF DEPARTURE

To construct a permanent force of the Islamic dawa and support movements engaged in jihad across the Muslim world, to varying degrees and insofar as possible.

a-Elements:

To protect the dawa with the force necessary to guarantee its security at the local and international levels.

To make contact with all new movements engaged in jihad, everywhere on the planet, and with Muslim minorities, and to create links as needed to establish and support collaboration.

To maintain jihad and awakening throughout the Ummah.

b-Procedures:

To form an autonomous security force to protect the dawa and its disciples locally and worldwide.

To study movements engaged in jihad in the Muslim world, as well as among Muslim minorities, to better understand them.

c-Suggested Missions:

To build bridges between movements engaged in jihad in the Muslim world, and between Muslim minorities, and to support them insofar as possible within a framework of collaboration. [emphasis added]
<end quote>

This theme is also picked up in Eleventh Point of Departure where it directs Muslim Brotherhood leaders to continue to agitate their followers to keep them in what counterterror analyst Oliver Guitta has called a "jihad frame of mind" by leveraging the Palestinian jihad against Israel amongst their followers and "to breed a feeling of resentment towards the Jews and refuse any form of coexistence with them".

This same template of continuously escalating agitation has been directed against French law enforcement. In the November 2005 intifada, the "hero" was a Muslim boy who electrocuted himself while trying to hide from pursuing police. This most recent incident over the weekend involved the death of two Muslim "youths" riding a stolen motorbike that crashed at a high rate of speed into a police vehicle. Riots around Paris began almost immediately.

Muslim leaders have used these respective incidents to cultivate a "jihad frame of mind" to incite to violence the Muslim immigrant youth in the French cities. Since the November 2005 riots, attacks against police officers have continued on almost a daily basis in the banlieues. Now the attacks have grown more violent as the "urban guerrillas" are using firearms to attack police.

What is happening currently in France, and the campaign of violence and crime used by Muslim leaders elsewhere in Europe (such as Malmo, Sweden, the third largest city in the country that has been paralyzed by violence from the Muslim community against non-Muslims), fits perfectly into the strategic framework outlined in another Muslim Brotherhood document published a decade after "The Project".

The second Muslim Brotherhood document I want to examine came out of the Holy Land Foundation terror financing trial this past summer as an exhibit for the prosecution. Entitled, "
An Explanatory Memorandum: On the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America", bears a publication date of May 1991, but indicates that it represents principles outlined by the Muslim Brotherhood as early as 1987.
Under Section Four of the document, "The Process of Settlement", it identifies the "grand mission" of the organization as the "Civilization Jihadist responsibility":

<quote>
In order for Islam and its Movement to become "a part of the homeland" in which it lives, "stable" in the land, "rooted" in the spirits and minds of its people, "enabled" in the lives of its society and has firmly-established "organizations" on which the Islamic structure is built and with which the testimony of the civilization is achieved, the Movement must plan and struggle to obtain "the keys" and the tools of this process in carry out this grand mission as a "Civilization Jihadist" responsibility which lies on the shoulders of Muslim and - on top of them - the Muslim Brotherhood in this country. (page 5 of 18)
<end quote>

In that same section, it directs leaders to foster "understanding the role of the Muslim Brother in North America" as the destruction and "sabotaging" of Western civilization from within through the "Civilization-Jihadist Process":

The process of settlement is a "Civilization-Jihadist Process" with all the means. The Ikhwan [the Arabic name for the Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah's religion is made victorious over all other religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet. It is a Muslim's destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is not escape from that destiny except for those who chose to slack. But, would the slackers and the Mujahedeen be equal. (Page 7 of 18, emphasis added)

The critical aspect to the "Civilization-Jihadist Process" is that it works upon two separate lines: "their (non-Muslim) hands" and "the hands of believers". The document further outlines how to exploit existing internal weaknesses within Western civilization: "we must possess a mastery of the art of 'coalitions', the art of 'absorption' and the principles of 'cooperation'". Through internal sabotage and creating their own external pressure (jihad/terrorism), they aim to topple the West. (I would highly recommend the respective detailed analyses of this Muslim Brotherhood document by my colleagues
LTC Joseph Myers, Pentagon analyst Stephen Coughlin, and the researchers at the NEFA Foundation.)

The present violence we are seeing in France and elsewhere is undeniably the Muslim Brotherhood's "Civilization-Jihadist Process" at work. As I previously noted, the violence in France never officially ended after November 2005, it just continued on a limited scale low enough to prevent a forceful response by authorities. With a new pretended provocation, the forces of jihad have re-inflamed their supporters, only in this case escalating matters even further by resorting to arms.

This jihadist pattern of intense peaks of violence, followed by extended periods of low-level conflict, then with even more intense violence, is a pattern used by the Muslim Brotherhood's Palestinian arm, HAMAS, in their insurgency against Israel. As described by Yaniz Ofek here at FrontPage earlier this month, "
The Islamic 'Muqawama'", the doctrine of muqawama is a "long, obstinate, and persistent struggle".

But unlike conventional warfare, as Ofek notes, muqawama can be distinguished by four unique patterns:

1) Muqawama, whether in Israel or in the West, is seen as part of the larger global jihad;
2) Little emphasis is placed on territory;
3) Death is seen as an advantage;
4) Battle is almost conducted amongst civilians.

Ehud Yaari of the Washington Institute also explains ("
The Muqawama Doctrine") in this constant state of warfare, both HAMAS and Hezbollah have acknowledged that "when in need of a respite, it is permitted to reach hudna (armistice) agreements, valid for a limited period only." These periods of hudna do not necessarily mean the complete cessation of hostilities, but reining in the violence to lower levels to prepare for the next expected period of assault without provoking confrontation with the enemy. This has been the official pattern of conflict followed for the past two decades by HAMAS.

The endgame of muqawama and the "Civilization-Jihadist Process" is "the erosion of the enemy's resolve". For this reason, as Yaari notes, "the essence is to spill blood, and since that is the case, it is better to focus on the civilian population as the primary target".

The French intifada is taking place not only in the heart of France, but in the heart of Europe itself. Much like the 9/11 attacks that were directed at the financial and political centers of America, both symbolically and really, the constant campaign of violence by Muslims throughout Europe are intended to extend the global jihad to the deepest centers of the West. But rather than confront the West militarily, the battle against Western civilization that they have already enjoined is going to take place in the banlieues, not the battlefield. Various instruments of violence are being used, ranging from crime, rioting, and as we see in Paris today, urban warfare. Terrorism is currently used only occasionally to initiate peak periods, but we can expect its increased use as the conflict continues.

The difficulty for us on the working end of the "Civilization-Jihadist Process" is that our leaders have steadfastly refused to understand the nature of the threat and the interrelation between what is happening in Paris, France and Khandahar, Afghanistan. While different methodologies are being used, the endgame is still the same: the establishment of the global caliphate through jihad. We must come to terms with strategy and operations of radical Islam in the West, the manner in which they manage conflict, and realize the immanent nature of the threat already in our midst - a lesson the French are learning first-hand.

Until we do, the strategic planning of the forces of the global jihad, as expressed in "The Project" and other Muslim Brotherhood planning documents, will continue to meet with unimpeded success.

Thursday, November 29, 2007

More Items on Cell Phone & Tower-Antenna Hazards

Thanks to Thanassis Mandafounis and Russell Olinsky for forwarding these.

The "small antenna" prohibitions is perhaps the only way to regulate microwave radiation exposures.  In the USA, under Clinton, ordinary citizens and local cities and counties lost their legal rights to set stricter standards for cell-phone antennas, which today can only be "regulated" at the federal level (by groups of federal bureaucrats and representatives of the microwave industry).  Of course, they ONLY are interested in your health, for sure.  Absolutely.  Without a doubt.  Just like the FDA and AMA.

++++++++

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/916666.html

Knesset bans placing cellular antennas on residential buildings
By Zafrir Rinat, Haaretz Correspondent, and Eran Gabay, The Marker Correspondent

Cellular antennas will no longer be placed in living quarters, including balconies, the Knesset Internal Affairs and Environment Committee approved Wednesday, as part of a unanimous endorsement of the non-ionizing radiation regulations.

The Non-Ionizing Radiation Law was introduced in 2005, and came into effect in January 2007, but the attached regulations were yet to be set.

The cellular companies claim the ban was an opportunistic move, but the Forum for Sane Cellular Consumption stresses that it was included in the Environment Ministry's first draft on the issue.

Committee chairman MK Ophir Pines-Paz (Labor) categorically told the panel that unless the regulations ban the placing of antennas on balconies, he will not allow the vote. The regulations stipulate that in specific cases the environment minister can sanction the placing of antennas on rooftop balconies.

The regulations may bear severe ramification for the cellular companies, since antenna operation permits must be renewed every five years. Therefore, antennas which are currently placed on balconies would have to be relocated when their permits expire.

The Cellular Companies Forum issued an enraged comment: "This is the end of the cellular companies' ability to establish a cellular infrastructure in Israel. The new regulations pose enormous obstacles for Israel's cellular network. The result would be fewer antennas: radiation levels would rise and reception and other services would be severely affected. We are preparing for an all-out war against these regulations."

The regulations also stipulate that the radiation level standard will remain unchanged for now, and a mechanism to review radiation level standards periodically will be employed. In addition, the environment minister will be required to hold public hearings regarding cellular radiation issues. Finally, the regulations stipulate that a company that carries out radiation surveys and more than 20 percent of its income emanate from a cellular company would have to announce it publicly to boost transparency.

Four municipalities ban small size antennas

Four big cities - Jerusalem, Raanana, Herzliya and Ashdod - have recently decided to ban further erection of small size antennas in their jurisdiction. The ban goes in line with the law that prohibits the construction of wireless stations that are bigger than 30X50X80cm without building permits.

It is expected that other cities will join the fight against the present process of setting up small cellular antennas.

According to law, cellular firms can set up a small antenna, known as a "wireless access facility," without informing the public and without receiving a building permit.

The cities are now demanding companies apply for building permits for these antennas too. The use of such antennas has grown enormously, since permits for large antennas can be difficult to receive, and can take a long time.

While there are no comprehensive figures on the number of such small antennas, estimates suggest 800 antennas are in use, making up about 10 percent of all antennas in the country.

The Ministry for Environmental Protection has decided to fall in line with the cities' decisions. But the companies intend to fight, and are considering legal action, claiming that the installation of such antennas is legal, and cannot be prevented.

++++++

Another related item:

Cell Phone and Tower RF Radiation Meter  PIERS Online  Vol. 3  No. 7  2007  pp: 1148-1150

The Effects of 884 MHz GSM Wireless Communication Signals on Self-reported Symptom and Sleep (EEG)-
An Experimental Provocation Study

http://piers.mit.edu/piersonline/piers.php?volume=3&number=7&page=1148

Sunday, November 25, 2007

Mainstream Science Groping Blindly, Touches Saharasia...

The problem goes back a lot longer than 500 years, is not such a simple thing as "climate produces wars", and temperature alone is not the primary variable involved.  But interesting to see a few are sniffing about in the right direction.  Now, if they will only discover how extreme drought, desertification and famine-starvation destroys entire societies, damaging the maternal-infant bond and male-female love-bonds as a consequence, or even dare to review my "Saharasia" work on this subject (http://www.saharasia.org) they might get to the point of it.

Thanks to Jai Daemion for the alert on this one.

J.D.

++++++++++

New Scientist
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/dn12936-war-has-historic-links-to-global-climate-change.html
War has historic links to global climate change
Catherine Brahic

Climate change and conflict have gone hand-in-hand for the past 500 years, a study reveals.

It is the first time that a clear link between war and changing global temperatures has been identified in historical data, according to the researchers involved. The results are also significant because some experts predict that current and future climate change may result in widespread global unrest and conflict.
Most recently, the secretary general of the United Nations, Ban Ki- Moon, wrote in an article published in The Washington Post that the on-going conflict in Darfur, Sudan was "a conflict that grew at least in part from desertification, ecological degradation, and a scarcity of resources".
Other experts are concerned that rising sea levels will create a new type of refugee - referred to as the "climate refugee" - by displacing millions of people who currently live in low-lying coastal regions.
A recent study linked climate change to 1000 years of conflict in China, but until now, few studies have looked at whether long-term climate change in the past has been accompanied by increased conflict on a global scale.

Violent conflict
"Our basic model is that deviations in temperature can hamper crop production," says Peter Brecke of the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, US. This, in turn, has three effects: increasing food prices, a greater risk of death from starvation, and increased social tension, which leads to violent conflict.
Brecke and colleagues in Hong Kong, China, and the UK scanned worldwide historical records on food prices, population levels and conflicts and compared this data with long-term temperature records. The data extended as far back as 1400.
"We found that anecdotes [of climate changes leading to conflict] seem to fit a broader pattern," says Brecke.
Most notably, Brecke and his team noticed a relatively peaceful period between the early 1700s and the early 1800s, compared to the previous 250 years. They first noticed the pattern in Europe, then found that it held true in China as well.
The 100 year period came just before the end of Little Ice Age, which lasted from 1450 to the late 1800s. When the researchers looked at temperature records, they found that it corresponded to a short term 100-year warming period.
Food shortages
Brecke acknowledges that temperature is not the only factor that causes wars, but believes it can exacerbate the conditions. The researchers believe that cooler temperatures during the Little Ice Age caused a drop in crop yields which exacerbated conflicts.
The 100-year warming period would have briefly relieved social tensions, he says. But, from the early to mid-1800s, temperatures dropped again, and conflicts resumed.
Although the world is now predicted to get warmer, not cooler, the researchers point out that forecasts suggest global warming will lead to long-term food shortages much as cooling did during the Little Ice Age, by disrupting global water cycles.

"Modern societies have more mechanisms to cope with these problems," says Brecke. But he cautions that the mechanisms may fail if society is forced to cope with a whole slew of environmental problems at the same time, as is predicted by several major environmental reports.
"If other problems emerge that impede our ability to address [food shortages] we may well see warfare erupt, and it should not be that big a surprise," he told New Scientist.
Journal reference: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0707304104)

Islam, Slavery and Rape

Two items below.  The Sexual Misery of Youth, far beyond anything Reich imagined when he wrote about the miserable situation in post-WWI Europe.

++++++++

Item #1 -- thanks to Peter Nasselstein for sending this item.

GrandPa and Grand-Daughter?  Nope.  Husband and Wife(s), after swapping a few camels, and with the threat of death if she dares to resist.

Islam, Slavery and Rape
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=16027ED9-FFFE-4E3C-B9B6-30E0F0D980FC

By Jamie Glazov
FrontPageMagazine.com | Thursday, November 22, 2007

Frontpage Interview's guest today is Bill Warner, the director of the Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI) and spokesman for politicalislam.com. CSPI's goal is to teach the doctrine of political Islam through its books and it has produced an eleven book series on political Islam. Mr. Warner did not write the CSPI series, but he acts as the agent for a group of scholars who are the authors. The Center's latest book is The Submission of Women and Slaves, Islamic Duality.

FP: Bill Warner, welcome back to Frontpage Magazine. This is the second part in our two-part series with you on the Center's most recent book. In
the first part we discussed Islam and its doctrine on the submission of women. In this second and final part we will discuss the matter of slavery. Welcome to Frontpage Interview.

Warner: It is a pleasure to work with Frontpage.

FP: So tell us in general where Islam stands on slavery.

Warner: Islam's stand on slavery is based on its political principles of submission and duality. The principle of submission could not be clearer. By definition a slave is the most submissive of all people. You become a slave only when you have no more choices. A slave has completely submitted to a master.

The principle of duality is shown by the fact that Islam does not enslave Muslims, only kafirs (non-Muslims). Since only kafirs are enslaved, it assures that more of the world submits to Islam.

Islamic slavery is based on the Trilogy of the Koran, the Sira (Mohammed's life) and the Hadith (the Traditions of Mohammed). All three texts say that slavery is permitted, ethical, desirable and a virtue. There is not one single negative word about slavery.

Slavery is seen as a process that brings kafirs to Islam. It is a virtue to free slaves, but Mohammed only freed slaves who submitted to Islam. If the kafir slave does not submit, then their children will. So given enough time, slaves convert to Islam. That is one of the reasons that Islam sees slavery as a positive.

Of course, there is another reason that Islam sees slavery as being so "good" and that is the money. Mohammed and the other jihadists made a fortune out of enslaving kafirs. Mohammed used the money for more jihad. So slavery financed the spread of Islam and jihad from the beginning.

FP: What were the ingredients of Mohammed's own life in terms of slavery?

Warner: Mohammed is the perfect pattern for all humanity and his life was saturated in slavery. When his mother died, it was a freed slave who nursed him. His first wife owned slaves. One of his first converts was a slave. His closest friend, Abu Bakr, traded one of his black kafir slaves for a Muslim who was enslaved by a kafir.

But all of this was small change compared to his envolvement with slavery once he turned to jihad. In his first major battle at Badr, he stood by and prayed as his henchmen beat and tortured captured slaves to get information about the enemy kafirs.

Slaves made Mohammed's pulpit. Slaves mended his cloths, cooked his food, and did every thing that a slave does for the master. He gave away slaves as gifts and received them as gifts. He went to war to kill the males so that the remaining people would surrender to be sold as slaves. Mohammed sold slaves on both the retail and wholesale markets.

He offered captured slaves their freedom if they would first agree that he was the prophet of Allah. A kafir slave then became a slave of Allah, because all Muslims are slaves of Allah. For a slave, the religion of Mohammed started and ended with slavery.

FP: Can you talk a bit about Islam and sexual slavery?

Warner: All morality in Islam is patterned after the example of Mohammed. Everything that he did and said defines what is permitted or "good". Mohammed repeatedly sanctioned forced sex (rape) with kafir females after they were captured. The Hadith clearly reports that he got first choice of the women. In one case, he repeatedly demanded one particular woman for himself and swapped two other kafir slave women for his choice. So if Mohammed was involved in the rape of kafirs, then rape is a virtue, not a sin or error.

When Mohammed destroyed the B. Qurayza tribe, all of the adult male Jews were beheaded, so that no husbands were left. Mohammed then took the children and gave them to Muslims to raise as Muslims and he sold off the Jewish women as slaves.

We know from another story that the women were divided into sex slaves and domestic slaves. In one scene, a jihadist is trying to obtain a high ransom for a woman and he is told that her breasts are flat and her mouth is cold, so her value was less. In short, she was only good for work around the house, not in the bedroom.

The Hadith tells of another story where the Muslims used coitus interruptus to avoid impregnating the kafir sex slaves. The reason was purely for business. If the kafir sex slave was pregnant, then she was worth less money.

Islamic doctrine says that kafir women should not be used for prostitutes, only for the pleasure of the master.

When Mohammed attacked the Jews at Khaybar, many moral precedents were set. Sexual slavery received an entire set of rules. Muslims were not to rape pregnant or menstruating women until they had delivered the child or finished their periods. At Khaybar, Mohammed's god Allah, announced that even married women were fair game for rape.

Mohammed only killed some of the Jews at Khaybar. The male and female survivors were needed to work the land as dhimmis. (The original dhimmis were semi-slaves with no civil rights. Today, dhimmis are ignorant kafirs who apologize for Islam.) Since Islam needed the men to work, husbands were left alive. That was the reason that the Koran said that in this case, even with the husbands looking on, it was good to rape the women.

Sexual slavery was not only fun and profitable for the Muslim men, but rape was a powerful tactic of war, then and today. The women are forced into submission to Muslim men and the husbands are humiliated. Humiliated men are weakened men, so more kafirs were less able to resist Islam.

For some time Mohammed's favorite sex partner was a Christian slave from Egypt named Mary. One of Mohammed's wives caught him in some state of intimacy with Mary in the wife's bedroom and raised hell. Mohammed promised to not do it again and moved Mary to her own apartment in Medina.

Mohammed had received Mary and her sister as gifts. He gave her sister away to a Muslim poet. He was used to giving away sex slaves. He gave several of his top lieutenants kafir sex slaves. Umar, who later became caliph, gave his sex slave to his son. [As an aside, when he was caliph, his son got drunk and Umar beat him to death.]

FP: This institution of Islamic sexual slavery isn't just a reality of the past is it?

Warner: Everything that has been said up to now is not only history; it is Sunna (the example of the perfect pattern of action and morality found in Mohammed). So today we don't have a beautiful blonde Christian girl on the block in Mecca, but we have continuous and ongoing rapes by Muslims in kafir cities. This goes on everywhere that Islam goes because it is Sunna.

This is a continuous 1400-year history of jihad. In every detailed history that comes from the original documents from history, rape is a constant. You have to look in the original documents, since our historians refuse to report it in so-called history books.

Rape is Sunna. Rape is not a sin. Rape is permitted and encouraged by Mohammed and the Koran. Islam is the only political system in the world that includes rules for rape and war. Rape is jihad. How good can it get? A Muslim gets to rape a kafir girl and get heaven credits. All jihad is a ticket to Paradise.

The most disgusting aspect of the Islamic rape of kafirs is not the rapes, but the kafir response. Kafirs become dhimmis by ignoring the rapes. I challenge you to find one, even one, mention of Islamic rape in the history books.

Islamic rape is more taboo than the N-word in the media. At least the N-word is acknowledged to exist. Even unicorns exist in media fantasy. But Islamic rape is forbidden to even exist as a fantasy.

And to reach a fevered rant: our so-called "feminist" scholars are absolutely intellectually and morally bankrupt hypocrites. They are traitors to our culture and a shame and a disgrace. They remain silent in the face of heinous crimes against women. They are arch-dhimmis when they refuse to speak of the Sunna, history and current rapes of our daughters, mothers, and sisters.

And our tax dollars support their evil in our public universities.

FP: Mohammed was a white man and had black slaves, correct? Isn't there a racism here? Where is all the leftist indignation against Islam on this issue?

Warner: The relationship between blacks and slavery is ironic. A standard approach of Islam to blacks is that Christianity is the religion of the white man and Islam is the natural religion of the black man. They add that Mohammed's second convert was a black slave, Bilal, who was Mohammed's companion and the first muezzin (the man who calls to prayer).

The Hadith, however, goes out of its way, many times, to tell the world that Mohammed was a white man. The Hadith also tells us the race of the kafirs that Mohammed enslaved. And Mohammed had many black slaves in his household. One of his slaves was a black man called, Anjasha.

Mohammed owned black slaves. It is that simple. His favorite wife, the child Aisha, had a black slave. But to be fair to Mohammed, he was not a racist about slavery. He enslaved Arabs, Africans, and Greeks. Islam enslaves all kafirs, independent of race.

Mohammed was politically incorrect about blacks and called them "raisin heads" in the Hadith. Thus it would be a compliment to call a black Muslim a "raisin head." It would be Sunna and not offensive. Mohammed also said that Muslims are to obey the Islamic leader, "even if they were black." A left-handed compliment, at best.

Mohammed used his robe to shield Aisha, so she could watch black slaves perform a martial arts routine in the mosque. The Hadith tells of a prophecy about a black man bringing evil to Islam. Black men were prophesized to destroy the Kabah.

But when Muslims preach to blacks they only say that Islam's first muezzin was a black man. They don't tell the rest of the story.

FP: Can you give us a brief synopsis of the history of Islamic slavery?

Warner: It all started with Mohammed and then went worldwide.

When Islam burst out of Arabia into the kafir world, they took the wealth and slaves. Slavery was an unapologetic part of jihad.

The Arabic language is a good place to see how important slavery was. In
The Submission of Women and Slaves, we collected over 30 Arabic words that deal with slavery. We think that Arabic has more words for slaves than any other language.
Both a black African and a black slave have the same name, abd. The historical reason for this is that African slavery was so important to Islamic economics. Language reflects history. Islamic legal history is filled with the complaints by African Muslim jurists about how Arabic Muslim slave traders captured African Muslims and sold them on the auction block.

History records around 11,000,000 Africans being sent to the Americas and about 13,000,000 being sent to Islamic countries for a total of 24,000,000 African slaves. To get one slave, many others have to be killed for the tribe to surrender to enslavement. The old, sick and children are left behind to starve. These collateral deaths are conservatively estimated to about 5 to 1. So that implies that over 1400 years, 120,000,000 million Africans have been killed to furnish Islam with its profits.

The accepted history of race in the U.S. is that white men captured Africans, brought them to the U.S. and sold them as slaves. This is wrong. When the white slavers showed up on the west coast of Africa, they didn't capture Africans. They looked them over in the pens, gave the Muslim slave traders their money, took their bills of sale, and loaded their purchases into their boats.

The Muslims had been plying the trade of war, capture, enslavement, and sale for a thousand years. Mohammed was a slave trader. Long after the white slave traders quit, the Muslims continued their African slave trade. It still exists today.

And to put a fine point on it, many African slaves were castrated by removing both testicles and penis. Castrated slaves brought more on the slave block. Castrated blacks were the traditional keepers of Mohammed's mosque in Medina.

African slaves were called abd; white slaves were called mamluk. Most black slaves were used in mining and heavy fieldwork. White slaves were used more for skilled trades. White slaves were even promoted to leadership positions, if they converted. Only one black slave was promoted to leadership. He ruled Egypt and was a eunuch.

Over a million white slaves were taken from Europe. Our word, slave, comes from Slav. A white woman was the highest price slave for 1400 years on the Meccan auction block. The Muslim who could not afford a white sex slave choose an Ethiopian woman at a third of the price.

The most revolting enslavement of whites was how Turkish Muslims took as a tax, one out of five Christian children in Islamic ruled Eastern Europe. These male children were taken back to Turkey where they became the janissaries, elite soldiers for the sultan. The Turkish sultans did not trust tribal Muslims to be the elite palace guards, since they all harbored ancient tribal rivalries. We see the same distrust of Muslim tribal politics in Afghanistan, where kafirs are used as presidential guards.

The Hindus were enslaved, but we don't have the number. We do know that jihad took half of ancient Hindustan and killed 80,000,000 Hindus. We have accountings of Hindus being enslaved by the hundreds of thousands at a time.

Muslims enslave everyone, but no one enslaves Muslims. This knowledge is part of Islam's arrogance and superiority. They know the history; it is the dhimmis (kafir apologists) who are ignorant of the doctrine and history of Islamic slavery.

FP: The violent capture and enslavement of black Africans by Muslim Arabs continues to this today. The root of this modern-day slavery is, of course, Islamic doctrine.

Warner: The enslavement of Africans is happening today. The only reason that Islam stopped enslaving whites and Hindus is that Islam is too weak to resist the social pressure. The Sunna of slavery has not changed, just the ability to use their law.

In the African countryside Muslims are still using jihad to enrich themselves. I have spoken with a Sudanese slave who escaped. The Muslims killed his parents and took him and his sister. Each night the jihadists gang raped his sister. Remember, rape is Sunna.

When he met his new masters, they put him in the middle of a circle of the family and each beat him with a stick. He was told that his new name was Abd, black slave. He slept in the barn with the animals.

Our media and intellectuals are quick to punish the slightest insult by a white against a black man, but they have not the slightest recognition of murder, rape and enslavement of blacks by Islam. Our media and intellectuals are dhimmis.

FP: Final thoughts and comments?

Warner: Slavery is the fruit of Islamic duality. Mohammed, the master of dualism and submission, used slavery as a tool of jihad because it worked. Mohammed's life was infused with slavery. Slaves were the lifeblood of Islam. Mohammed, the white man, owned both male and female black slaves. His attitude was pure dualism.

The most disgusting thing about Islamic slavery is not that Muslims enslave others, but that we ignore it. The Muslims have been fed the Koran and the Sunna in their mother's milk. They are doing what is ethical according to Islam. In a strange way, Muslims are to be pitied. A Muslim is the first victim of Islam.

The criticism of whites because of their being involved in slavery is standard fair in the media and the universities. Try to find a university that even teaches about the killing of 120,000,000 Africans for Muslims to profit from the 24,000,000 slaves.

Blacks define themselves on the basis of slavery. They will not go beyond the white, Christian version of slavery. There is only one theory of history in the black community-the West African Limited Edition version of history. Blacks will not admit the broad scope of slave history. Hindu slavery? It never happened. White and European slavery? It never happened. Slavery on the East coast of Africa? It never happened. A massive slave trade through the Sahara into North Africa? It never happened. Black, eunuchs at the Medina mosque? It never happened. This incomplete history of slavery is what the taxpayers fund in the state universities.

How can black leaders ignore Islam's sacred violence in Africa? Why aren't the black columnists, writers, professors, or ministers speaking out? They are ignorant and in total denial. They are the molested children of Islam.

Blacks are dhimmis and serve Islam with their silence. There is a deep fear of Islam that makes them overlook and placate Islam. Arabs are the masters of blacks.

One thing whites and blacks have in common is that their ancestors were enslaved by Islam, and both are too ignorant to know it. Blacks and whites have a secret shame buried under the denial of being slaves inside Islam.

But the rest of the media and intellectuals line up as dhimmis, too. One of the marks of a dhimmi under the fourth caliph, Umar, was that a dhimmi was forbidden to study the Koran. The chief mark of dhimmitude today is ignorance of the Koran, the Sira and the Hadith. The ignorance of kafir intellectuals about Islam is profound.

They don't know about how jihad killed the 120,000,000 Africans, the 60,000,000 Christians, the 80,000,000 Hindus or the 10,000,000 Buddhists. Our intellectuals do not know about the Tears of Jihad (detailed in all of our books). That is a lot of death and ignorance-270,000,000 dead. Our intellectuals don't know, don't care and don't bother. They deny.

University Islamic studies never mention the Islamic political doctrine. The media discusses Islam in terms of political correctness, and multiculturalism. History courses don't teach about the civilizational annihilation due to jihad. Religious leaders placate imams in public gatherings and have no knowledge what the imam actually thinks of them. Political thinkers do not even know Islam as a political force

The problem with this ignorance is that our intellectuals are unable to help us. They do not understand that Islam is a civilization based upon the ideal of dualism. Islamic ethics and politics have one set of rules for Muslims and another for kafirs. Our civilization is based upon the ideal of unitary ethics, the Golden Rule. We do not have two sets of laws and ethics, like Islam. Our intellectuals cannot explain what dualism has meant in the past or what it will mean for our future-civilizational annihilation.

Our intellectuals and the media have only one view of Islam-a glorious civilization. They have created the "terrorist", a bogus term based upon ignorance. And the "terrorist" is not even a "real" Muslim, but an extremist fundamentalist. All of these terms are based upon a profound ignorance of Islamic political doctrine.

Intellectuals cannot connect the dots of persecution of other intellectuals and artists today, such as Salman Rushdie, Theo van Gogh, the Mohammed cartoon riots, and Daniel Pearl. Their persecution is part of a 1400 year Islamic tradition of keeping all intellectuals and artists in line with the doctrine of political Islam. But for our intellectuals, there is no history, no connection, no pattern, no doctrine of Islam. Their only doctrine is the doctrine of denial. These intellectuals write our textbooks. Then our tax dollars buy the books to feed the ignorance.

What explains the intellectuals' silence and ignorance? The enormous violence of jihad has produced the psychology of the "molested child" syndrome. Intellectuals fear, apologize for, and placate the Islamic abusers, ignoring the violence of the past. Then they turn around and advise our politicians. The result is an ignorant populace who look to our intellectuals for guidance and find treachery and lies.

FP: Bill Warner, thank you for joining us.

Warner: Thank you for standing against political Islam.

++++++++

Item #2 -- thanks to Eric Krieg for sending this item,

Afghan boy dancers sexually abused by former warlords
Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:08pm EST
http://www.reuters.com/article/email/idUSISL1848920071119
UL-E KHUMRI, Afghanistan (Reuters) - They are known as "bacha bereesh", boys without beards, teenage boys who dress up as girls and dance for male patrons at parties in northern Afghanistan.

It's an age old practice that has led to some of the boy dancers being turned into sex slaves by wealthy and powerful patrons, often former warlords, who dress the boys up as girls, shower them with gifts and keep them as "mistresses".

Afghan police are battling to crackdown on the practice which has angered Islamic clerics who say those involved should be stoned for sodomy, forbidden under Islamic law.

In a society where the sexes are strictly segregated, it is common for men to dance for other men at weddings in Afghanistan.

But in northern Afghanistan, former warlords and mujahideen commanders have taken that a step further with competitions for their dancing boys.

"Every boy tries to be the first. They are dressed in women's clothes, have bells on their feet and have artificial breasts," said Mohammad Yawar, a former mujahideen fighter against the Taliban and resident of the northern town of Pul-e Khumri.

The practice, called "bacha bazi" -- literally "boy play" -- has a long history in northern Afghanistan, but sometimes it does not stop with just dancing.

"I very much enjoy hugging a boy. His smell and fragrance kills me," said Yawar.

The 38-year-old businessman said he recruited a 15-year-old boy three years ago to help him with his work.

"I have had him for at least three years, since he was only 15. He was looking for a job and I gave him somewhere to stay," said Yawar, showing the boy's picture.

"I don't have a wife. He is like my wife. I dress him in women's clothes and have him sleep beside me. I enjoy him and he is my everything," he said, kissing the photograph.

MARK OF PRESTIGE

Having the best-looking boy and the best dancer is a mark of prestige.

"Everyone tries to have the best, most handsome and good-looking boy," said a former mujahideen commander, who declined to be named.

"Sometimes we gather and make our boys dance and whoever wins, his boy will be the best boy."

Former mujahideen commanders hold such parties in and around Pul-e Khumri about once a week.

"Having a boy has become a custom for us. Whoever wants to show off, should have a boy," said Enayatullah, a 42-year-old landowner in Baghlan province.

"I was married to a woman 20 years ago, she left me because of my boy," he said. "I was playing with my boy every night and was away from home, eventually my wife decided to leave me. I am happy with my decision, because I am used to sleeping and entertaining with my young boy."

The men say they lavish money and gifts on their boys.

"I was only 14-years-old when a former Uzbek commander forced me to have sex with him," said Shir Mohammad in Sar-e Pol province. "Later, I quit my family and became his secretary. I have been with him for 10 years, I am now grown up, but he still loves me and I sleep with him."

Ahmad Jawad, aged 17, has been with a wealthy landowner for the past two years.

"I am used to it. I love my lord. I love to dance and act like a woman and play with my owner," he said.
Asked what he would do when he got older, he said: "Once I grow up, I will be an owner and I will have my own boys."

But Shir Mohammad, at 24, was already getting too old to be a dancing boy. "I am grown up now and do not have the beauty of former years. So, I proposed to marry my lord's daughter and he has agreed to it."

POVERTY

Many local residents have called for a crackdown, but are skeptical it will work as many of the men are powerful and well-armed former commanders.

Jahan Shah, who lives in Pul-e Khumri, said government and security officials should take tough action against unIslamic and immoral acts.

"If they don't stop this, it will become a custom and hundreds of other boys will be involved in it," he said.

Police and security officials in northern Afghanistan say they have been doing their best to arrest the men involved.
"It is sad to state that this practice that includes making boys dance, sexual abuse and sometimes even selling boys, has been going on for years," said General Asadollah Amarkhil, the security chief of Kunduz province.
"We have taken steps to stop it to the extent that we are able," he said.

Amarkhil said poverty, widespread in Afghanistan after nearly three decades of war, forced teenage boys into compliance.

"We have taken very strict measures to save the lives of the boys and punish the men," he said. "We are monitoring to find out where these men and boys gather, then go there and arrest them."

Those found guilty of abuse would be jailed for at least 15 years, said Baghlan chief prosecutor Hafizullah Khaliqyar.
"We have 25 cases of such immoral acts. They are being processed and we are trying our utmost to tackle the problem," he said.

Islamic scholars recommended harsher punishment.

"Those who do this are the devil," said Mawlawi Mohammad Sadiq Sadiqyar, a scholar and prayer leader in the main northern city of Mazar-i-Sharif. "Under Islamic law, those who practice this should be stoned to death."
But some of the men say they are not interested in women.

"We know it is immoral and unIslamic, but how can we quit? We do not like women, we just want boys," said Chaman Gul, aged 35 of Takhar province.


Wednesday, November 21, 2007

"Infectious HIV" Is STILL Not the Cause of AIDS

It wasn't the cause in the 1990s, and still is not today, and is not even an infectious disorder, despite all the hype.

A new article recently appeared, confirming big problems in the getting everyone to swallow the hype, downgrading the typically hysterical UN Aids statistics:

U.N. to Cut Estimate Of AIDS Epidemic
Population With Virus Overstated by Millions
The United Nations' top AIDS scientists plan to acknowledge this week that they have long overestimated both the size and the course of the epidemic, which they now believe has been slowing for nearly a decade, according to U.N. documents prepared for the announcement.
AIDS remains a devastating public health crisis in the most heavily affected areas of sub-Saharan Africa. But the far-reaching revisions amount to at least a partial acknowledgment of criticisms long leveled by outside researchers who disputed the U.N. portrayal of an ever-expanding global epidemic.
The latest estimates, due to be released publicly Tuesday, put the number of annual new HIV infections at 2.5 million, a cut of more than 40 percent from last year's estimate, documents show. The worldwide total of people infected with HIV -- estimated a year ago at nearly 40 million and rising -- now will be reported as 33 million. ...
"There was a tendency toward alarmism, and that fit perhaps a certain fundraising agenda," said Helen Epstein, author of "The Invisible Cure: Africa, the West, and the Fight Against AIDS." "I hope these new numbers will help refocus the response in a more pragmatic way."

The new "revelations" aren't new, however, and are limited in scope. The original and most authentic critics of the WHO still remain silenced and censored out of the discussion.

Below is reproduce a congratulatory letter I sent to President M'beki of South Africa in the year 2000, after he refused to go along with the claims of the American CDC and UN-WHO to bankrupt his nation by spending billions on untested toxic medicines, to treat people who they claimed were going to die by the millions.  It never happened, and still isn't happening, as the WHO and CDC have basically been pulling numbers out of thin air to justify their expensive and deadly program of global anti-sex hysteria.

Some of this is now breaking into science journals and mainstream news reports -- after more than 20 years of public lying about and censorship of critical experts such as Dr. Peter Duesberg, author of "Inventing the AIDS Virus" and many other authors of books and papers on the subject.

Below also is a letter from an African doctor who had a clash with Dr. Peter Piot, head of the WHO, important because Piot is today being exposed for pushing phoney numbers of all sorts.

For a whole list of book and videos on this subject, available for years, see our offerings at our on-line bookstore:
http://www.naturalenergyworks.net
Scan down on the left-side for the list of books on the subject of "AIDS Mythology".

James DeMeo

++++++++

20 March 2000

"Infectious HIV" Is NOT the Cause of AIDS

Dear President Mbeki,

You are fully correct to be skeptical of the claims of the American Centers for Disease Control (CDC), and World Health Organization (WHO), both of which continue to misrepresent the facts regarding the epidemiology and science regarding AIDS.  Both of these organizations also continue to engage in bald censorship and scientific misconduct regarding AIDS research, notably in the willful silencing of dissenting scientific opinion regarding the claimed role of HIV in the causation of AIDS, and regarding the purported infectious nature of HIV, and the supposed "benefits" of mainstream AIDS-treatments such as toxic AZT.  They have condemned a high percentage of Africans according to this philosophical construct of circular reasoning, lacking in foundational support at nearly every key point in their argument. 

By contrast, there is a very reasonable and growing body of evidence, from physicians and research scientists in the USA, Europe and Africa, challenging the prevailing wisdom that HIV is the cause of AIDS, or that it is even an infectious malady.  It seems, this is not a proven case at all, and even the very existence of HIV is now under a cloud of suspicion, given the absence in any publication of a single photograph of pure HIV isolate as made from a density-graident band.  Even the feuding co-discoverers of HIV, Gallo and Montagnier, have never published such a photo, though supporters of HIV theory have managed to silence criticism on this and other important matters, which remains a major scandal in the sciences. This is in addition to significant evidence from other directions that the tests for HIV, Elisa and WB, are now known to cross-react with antibodies to dozens and dozens of better-known and more "ordinary" diseases which a person might be suffering from -- antibodies to malaria, TB, and leprosy, for example, are known to cross-react with the "tests", as are the healthy maternal antibodies found in breastmilk itself.  In fact, it is not an exaggeration to say, that the whole structure of the "HIV" argument, for explaining widespread "acquired immunological deficiency" has already crumbled into the dust.  The only reason this is not more widely known today, is due to the $7 billion spent annually on the gigantic "AIDS research" and pharmacy infrastructure which continues to act like a decapitated dinosaur, thrashing about from nervous energy -- it is expected to continue thrashing about for many more years, until the word finally reaches the general public and, from there, to the politicians.  Given the very large scientific questions which exist about the HIV theory, I hope you can appreciate the questionable validity of giving full support to an hypothesis which so dramatically condemns healthy people merely carrying a malaria antibody, or sick people struggling with parasites and malnutrition, or even mothers and babies whose systems are typically flooded with antibodies during and after pregnancy.  Antibodies have never by themselves been an indicator of risk, except with the claimed super-virus HIV, which if it exists at all, occurs in such tiny amounts it must be magnified by PCR methods, suggesting its biochemical significance is next to nothing.

As the next International AIDS Conference gets underway in a few days in South Africa, please do what you can to open up the issue to professional scientists critical of the "infectious HIV" theory of AIDS -- such as Dr. Peter Duesberg (author of "Inventing the AIDS Virus") and Dr. Kerry Mullis (inventor of the pcr methods currently abused in AIDS testing) and others in the "Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV Hypothesis of AIDS".  Don't be pressured or fooled by the prophets of AIDS doom, as the overwhelming majority of health problems in Africa are the consequence of maladies very well-known to most African physicians, long before the era of AIDS, and are not the product of some new "super-virus".

To emphasize the corruption presently at work within the very top levels of the WHO AIDS programme, I post below some materials which should be of central interest to you. Specifically is the attached article by Dr. Michael Mulugheta of Asmara, Eritrea, who had a prolonged encounter with Dr. Peter Piot, head of the WHO AIDS programme, which by any rational account should have forced a complete halt to the current AIDS program and investigation of Dr. Piot.  Dr. Mulugheta also discovered a possible biochemical linkage between maize-based "home brew" alcoholic beverages widely consumed in Africa, to yet another cross-reaction on the "AIDS tests" -- such alcoholics surely get sick, and are often given an inappropriate diagnosis of "AIDS", but recover if kept away from the alcohol.  In a similar manner, I know of patients in Africa who presented the symptoms of malaria, but who were diagnosed as having "AIDS" based upon the tests, and so were sent to an AIDS ward to die, not being treated for malaria or anything else as the expectation was, AIDS is incurable -- they refused the AIDS diagnosis, however, left the hospital and recovered completely when malaria medicines were administered by an HIV-skeptical physician, and you can ask Dr. Mulugheta and other HIV-critical physicians about this if you wish.  The director of the AIDS Program in Eritrea acknowledged to me privately, that he cannot rebel against the WHO, as there is too much money coming to them for laboratory equipment from WHO which can be diverted to other non-AIDS purposes, and so they are fearful to be "cut off" from the support if they dare speak a dissenting word. This situation is probably similar in most other African nations -- if you offend the WHO, you are cut off.  Dr. Mulugheta's article is basically a "whistleblower" report, most easily understood from the perspective of $7 billion being spent each year on intensive care to keep alive the bleeding dinosaur of "infectious HIV" AIDS orthodoxy -- this bleeding dinosaur in fact provides an enormous gravy-train for "AIDS research" and also for the gargantuan pharmacy industry.  Naturally, under such circumstances, the whistleblower is sent off to Siberia, so that the larger number of guilty persons may continue to roam freely.

Finally, I should ask you to pay serious attention to the facts disclosed in the recent articles by Anthony Brink <arbrink@iafrica.com>, a High Court advocate from the Pietermaritzburg Bar in South Africa, who wrote several major critiques of AIDS orthodoxy and AZT "medicine" for a South African magazine (some web addresses for these articles are given below).

You are correct to be suspicious of Western motivations regarding AIDS in Africa.  HIV has never been proven to be the cause of AIDS, nor has AIDS been proven to be an infectious malady.  Those who argue otherwise are not grounded in good science, and only get away with such statements by virtue of widespread "politically correct" media censorship and political repression of dissenting scientific opinion. 

With kind regards,

James DeMeo, Ph.D.
Director, Orgone Biophysical Research Lab
PO Box 1148, Ashland, Oregon 97520 USA

Signator of the Open Letter from the Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV Theory of AIDS.

Formerly on the faculty of Geography,
Illinois State University and University of Miami

Major Critics of "Infectious-HIV":

http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/whistleblowers.htm

The "Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV Hypothesis of AIDS"
http://virusmyth.net/aids/group.htm


PS.  I am informed that in Africa, a positive reaction on only two of the seven density-gradient bands in the "AIDS test" are required for a diagnosis of "AIDS", while in Australia, four of such reactive bands are required.  If we could raise enough money to fly all of the Africans who "test positive" to Australia, we could automatically cure at least half of them, and certainly for a lot less money than what the AZT pushers are demanding!  The last I heard, Galaxo-Wellcome was asking four times the price for AZT in South Africa as is routinely charged in Australia.  


+++++

Open Letter to the World Health Organization
(Letter #14)

FROM: Dr. Michael Mulugheta
Asmara, Eritrea, Africa


"But the peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is that it
is robbing the human race, posterity, as well as the existing generation of
those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it."
John Stuart Mill
English Philosopher and Economist (1806-1873)

"It is from the numberless diverse acts of courage and belief that human
history is made.  Each time a man stands up for an ideal or acts to improve
the lot of others or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny
ripple of hope, and crossing each other form a million different centres of
energy and daring, those ripples build a current which can sweep down the
mightiest walls of oppression and resistance."
Robert Kennedy, US Attorney General (1961-1964)
Delivered at the University of Cape Town, South Africa (June 1963)


Prologue

This document has provoked disbelief and even contempt for the last 10
years.  The reaction is anticipated.  The subject matter dealt with is not
only sensitive and emotional, it is also dreadful and incomprehensible.  It
also comes from an unexpected corner which compounds its complexity.  It
incriminates many scientists in the US and Western Europe, but not without
justification.  As a student, I have had an infallible respect for doctors
and their profession.  I thought the Hippocratic Oath was fully complied
with and that the doctor carried his profession to religious proportions.
I assume the average individual hods this stand... until one finds one's
self in the position I am in.  The problem I have been facing the last
decade is just this:  Whenever I say more that 10 scientists in 10 European
countries falsified my lab results, the regular reaction I have been
getting is "Why should they?  What interest do they have in doing so?"  Etc.


The Story: How it All Started

It all happened in 1989.  After having worked as a tropical doctor in
Malawi, I returned to the Netherlands at the end of 1988.  I worked in
Malawi for 3 years in a mission hospital where I was the only doctor.  My
duties included among other things surgical and gynecological operations,
specially cesarean sections.  AIDS was at that time about 4 years old and
the issue was "hot". Central African States were said to be the epidcentre
of the infection.  The risk from profession hazards was not properly
studied at that time.  Therefore, I got worried about the possible
infection from needle pricks and the like.  The concern continued even
after I returned to the Netherlands.

Six months after my return, I developed a urinary tract infection and
decided to take the antibiotics nitrofurantoin and ceclor simultaneously.
To avoid what we call "ping-pong" phenomenon, I gave the same regimen also
to my wife.  This later seemed to be a blessing in disguise.  Seven days
after the start of therapy, I developed partial deafness; over the next
several months, both of us subsequently (but only temporarily) developed an
array of illnesses with an astounding similarity to those attributed to the
HIV, even though we had discontinued taking the drug therapy some five
weeks earlier.

1.        Polyneuropathy
2.        Dermatitis
3.         Alopecia
4.         Allergic pneumonitis
5.         Herpes Zoster
6.         Severe throbbing headache
7.         Granulocytopenia
8.      Haemolytic anemia
9.     Tinnitus
10.     Black tongue

The Scandal of Falsification of Laboratory Reports

At the start of the first symptoms, I went to a specialist. Because of my
worries of the possible infection with HIV, I suggested the specialist if
he could request Elisa on me.  He agreed and then told me to give him a
call after 5 days for the report.

I telephoned him on the appointed date.  He said that I turned "strongly"
positive on Elisa, adding that Elisa is only a screening technique and he
would make an appointment for me with a specialist in Amsterdam where I
could have Western Blot taken on me.  Western Blot is a technique which is
said to be highly sensitive for it analyzes what antibodies one has from
the possible 9 antibodies against HIV.


The Amsterdam specialist (Dr. Meenhorst) ordered the Western Blot and he
told me to give him a call after 10 days for the result.  After 10 days, I
gave him the call and he told repeatedly on the phone that I had 2
antibodies against HIV, gp-41 and gp-120.  I started asking him questions
about the interpretation of the findings, specifically the fact that no
antinuclear antibodies were present.  The antinuclear antibody is said to
be present in cases which have not yet developed AIDS disease symptoms.
When he heard this question, he knew that the discussion would be a
difficult one, and so asked me to come to his consultation office in
person.  A week later I went to his office and he said "I have already told
you the result but I want to show you that you have all 9 antibodies
against the HIV".

This, then, was the root of the problem.  Since the last time we spoke on
the phone, there has not been any blood sample given.  At that time he told
me I had only 2 antibodies, gp-41 and gp-120.  Now, he said all 9 HIV
antibodies are there.  After being asked on the telephone about the
antinuclear antibodies, Dr. Meenhorst anticipated hot discussion when I
went personally to his office.  Therefore, to avoid the confrontation he
added the rest of the antibodies to have me convinced for good. The fact
that I am a doctor myself compounded the problem.

I later learned the head of the central lab of the academic hospital, Prof.
Goudsmid, played a key role in pushing Dr. Meenhorst to add the antibodies.
Prof. Goudsmid then carried the matter personally and did what he could to
prevent me from coming to the truth of finding only the original 2
antibodies at other testing laboratories.

The next place I went was to the University hospital where I studied
myself, hoping it would cooperate.  That hospital did not have the
facilities for doing Western Blot, but I went there to send an anonymous
blood sample out for analysis.  The professor in this hospital refused to
cooperate, although sending anonymous blood samples was legally allowed in
the Netherlands at that time.  This man simply advised me to accept my
ordeal and even suggested my children were most likely infected with HIV.
That was bestial of him to say, without any reason at hand.

There were only two centres in the Netherlands where Western Blot could be
performed.  There was a bottle-neck and even in the rest of Europe, the
number of centres that had facilities for Western Blot were limited.  Only
one or sometimes two in each country.  And unlike other lab items, Western
Blot results must also go through the head of the lab centre. So it is
especially difficult to be openly tested without the knowledge of the
laboratory boss on the matter.

After my frustration in the Netherlands, I went to the Tropical Institute
in Antwerp, Belgium.  The head of that institute was Professor Peter Piot,
the current director of the World Health Organization's (WHO) Global
Program on AIDS (GPA).  To cut it short, Professor Piot also falsified a
lab test on me, and worst of all predicted I had only 3 months to live!  He
even prescribed AZT and other drugs to immediately start.  Had I followed
his advice, I would have long been in my grave by now.  His personal
prescriptions are still in my possession.  AZT is a DNA chain terminator
which kills not only the virus but the host as well. Thousands of people
have died so far from this extra-toxic drug.

My next stop was the University of Hamburg, Germany.  Professor H.G. Thiele
did the same as the others before. He falsified on the instructions from
Netherlands and Germany.  I don't want to dwell on my experiences in more
than 10 countries-there is a book on this matter being prepared.  However,
I will list the most malignant professors who played the leading roles in
this matter:

1. Dr. P.L. Meenhorst, Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam
2. Prof. Goutsmit, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam
3. Prof. Peter Piot, Tropical Institute, Antwerps, Belgium
4. Prof. Dr. H.G. Thiele, University of Hamburg, Germany
5. Prof. F. Chiodo, University of Bologna, Italy
6. Dr. Perrin, Catalonal Universitiaire, Geneva, Switzerland

There are 6 other professors in other European countries who joined the
scandal, but I do not publicly list them as the documents which prove their
involvement is missing.  Sometimes, fortunately, their conspiracy was not
water-tight, and I could easily decipher the mechanism of their
communications.  For example, one lab technician in one of the remote
European countries where I went to be tested told me my name and the
country I came from-giving a false name is not a solution, as the
identification of a lone black man roaming Europe's limited laboratories,
asking for specific Western Blot test results on specific antibodies (not a
usual request)  is not that difficult to follow.

To prove their conspiracy, please look at the following lab reports given
at two different European countries and at a 6-month's interval between.
The results as could be seen are too identical to be true.  As all medical
doctors know, lab results fluctuate from lab to lab and in the same lab as
taken at different times.  The constituents and properties of blood are
dynamic and changes from time to time, and from place to place.  Weather is
also an important factor.  The hemodilution and hemoconcentration which
change in accordance to our fluid intake also affects lab results in
proportion to volume changes in the intra and extra cellular components.

Table 1:  Evidence of Conspiracy to Falsify Lab Results

                                Germany                         Italy           Holland
Lab item                Hamburg Lab     Bologna Lab     Control


Hb                             16.7            16.7            12.5

WBC                      4.09            4.09            3.75

Erythrocytes               5.71            5.71            4.5

T4/T8 ratio              0.53            0.53            0.8


Diff. Count

Neutro                   45.8            45.8            36.5

Lympho                     36.7            36.7            45.0

Mono                       5.6             5.6             3.0

Eos                      3.4             3.4             2.4

Baso                      0.7             0.7             0.5

Gamma G-T           13              13              11.5


No physician in their right mind would ever take the German and Italian
reports as authentic for such an identical report could never be reproduced
even in a single machine done on the same day.  These reports were done
over a time interval of 6 months and yet there is no difference whatsoever
between the two sets of data.  When the Germans instructed the Italians to
falsify my lab report and inform me of similar Western Blot results, they
made the silly mistake of simply copying over the results of the German
lab.

When I found the blood results from Italy being identical to the German
lab, it was a blessing in disguise, because I could then recheck the
hematological results from another third lab.  A week after the Italian
falsification, I returned to Holland and had an additional control test
made.  Although the results between the "Italian" and the Dutch labs was
only one week, they are dramatically different from the results between the
German and Italian labs.

In another case, the lab director became jittery and panicky at my
presence, and because he had not yet mastered the use of his computer,
inadvertently gave me the test result of another patient-as proved by the
inaccurate date when the blood sample was drawn.  It was obviously not
mine, and besides the real owner of the blood sample should have been by
now long dead as the results suggested.

This is part of the proof of the European Conspiracy.  When the Dutch
scientists firstly falsified the lab results and informed Prof. Peter Piot,
the issue developed into a snowball phenomenon to encompass the rest of
Europe. The doctor who first falsified the lab results did so because he
was convinced upon finding the 2 antibodies I was surely infected with HIV.
He knew that, because I am a doctor, he would get strong arguments from me.
If I were a layman, this whole issue would never have reached this
magnitude. Partly, my unwillingness to remain quiet about this abusive
treatment and falsification forced them to undertake additional steps to
cover up the scandal.  When I became aware of the falsifications, I decided
to unveil the truth.


The WHO Sends Me to Jail

The WHO declared in its Epidem. Rec. 1990:65 281-3 "The finding of two of
the three envelope bands (gp-160, gp-120 and gp-41) in the Western Blot is
enough and sufficient to diagnose Seropositivity".  This was a death

sentence to all the patients hat have been diagnosed thereafter.  Can
anybody imagine what the repercussions are of an AIDS diagnosis?  Many
people do not want to live any longer and many more commit suicide.  A
large number so told resort to the toxic AZT and die of it.  In fact,
almost all of the patients start dying the moment they are told they have
AIDS, not because of the disease but of the mere diagnosis.  This in short
is what the WHO did when it passed the above circular to the world.

For trying to disprove it scientifically, my doctors declared me insane and
threw me out of my job.  When I insisted to seek the truth through
disseminating their conspiracy to the rest of the world, they even resorted
to physical harassment.  I cris-crossed Europe covering 40 thousand
kilometers, wrote to more than 40 universities, research centres, medical
journals, and in so doing spent over 40,000 dollars.  I appealed at the
European Commission for Human Rights in Strasbourg, France, but they gave
me no heed.  I staged a hunger strike at the International Court of Justice
in The Hague, Netherlands, but they gave me a deaf ear also.

I appealed to the ministers of Justice of five European countries where the
conspiring doctors live, but there was no response from any one of them.  I
sent copies of documentation to many medical journals, such as Nature,
Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical
Association, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine, etc., etc., and got no
positive response.  The Lancet editors wrote to tell me that I "write a
very good tale".

Finally, I filed an action against the conspiring Dutch doctors at the
National Commission of Complaints on Medical Malpractice, but they didn't
want to listen to my complaints.  Worst of all, they kept me in suspense
for two years, and finally discarded my complaints as "unfounded" without
listening to my arguments or reviewing the documentation.

On 22 Feb. 1991, having tried all possible options, I paid a visit to WHO
offices in Geneva, Switzerland to air my complaints.  The reason why I went
there was to protest the very statement it made above which caused untold
misery and suffering not only to me personally but probably to millions of
humans across the world.  I specifically went to hand in my documentation
(a book titled "The European Connection") which narrates the entire
falsehood of the WHO wisdom on AIDS, and its repercussions.  The main
themes of my protest were:

1. That gp-120 and gp-41 are not specific for HIV only.

2. That gp-120 and gp-41 are not two different glycoproteins but are
antigenically the same differing in molecular weights in kilodaltons.

3. That the sugar Furanose in the drug called nitrofurantoin can cause the
generation of antibodies against gp-120 and gp-41, both of which the WHO
stated are enough and sufficient to draw serological diagnosis of HIV
infection.

For trying to present my documentation and arguments to the WHO, Prof.
Peter Piot (who was then at the Geneva WHO office) advised Dr. Dorothy
Blake (Deputy Director of the GPA) to have Swiss police take me away to
jail.   I then knew there was no justice in Europe, specially when the
offenders are white and high in social status, and the victim is a black
man.  When all attempts to uncover the truth failed, and my very existence
and those of my family was in danger, I fled the country (Netherlands)
where I had lived for around 15 years as a political refugee and went to
Eritrea.  Now that I live in the relative safety of a country I call my
own, I am writing again to unravel the scandalous acts of the European
doctors whose names are listed above.


Thirteen Prior Letters of Protest to WHO

In 13 separate prior letters to WHO, since my visit to their Geneva
headquarters on 22 Feb. 1991 (and my being jailed) I have protested the
following mischievous actions committed by that UN organization:

1. The catastrophic prescription of death it issued when handing out the
following circular worldwide, ie., "the finding of two antibodies of the
three (gp-160, gp-120 and gp-41) is enough and sufficient to make

serological diagnosis of HIV infection".

2. The provision of a safe haven to criminal doctors like Peter Piot who
falsify lab results of patients, especially Africans.  Peter Piot, the
current Director of the WHO GPA falsifies the lab results of people of
African origin just to convince them they have AIDS. he did that in 1989
when he was head of the Tropical Medicine Institute in Antwerp, Belgium.
Documents which prove this falsification are in my possession, and are
accessible to anyone interested.  The documents are even with the WHO
itself, but instead of investigating the crimes of Peter Piot, they have
raised him to the post of Director to the GPA.

3. The WHO is a mouthpiece for the omnipotent institutions in the USA  like
the Centres for Disease Control (CDC), and the National Institute of Health
(NIH).  It dances to the beats of those institutions and is totally
inaccessible to alternative views from elsewhere.  That is why Robert Gallo
and his cohorts have managed to fool the world on AIDS for the last 13
years.  Robert Gallo has innumerable criminal records in his curriculum
vitae.

The last decade, since I was declared HIV positive by a man no less than
the Director of the Global Program on AIDS, Prof. Peter Piot himself, both
my wife and I are perfectly healthy, in spite of the Professor's giving me
only 3 months to live.  To have me more convinced of his death sentence, he
added 7 antibodies to the list of the original two I had acquired from the
antibiotic nitrofurantoin.  Ladies and gentlemen, if my wife and me have
never employed the condom or any other mechanisms of the so-called
"protection" and yet are alive and thriving after more than 10 years, where
the hell is the "HIV"??

Within weeks after my wife and I had taken nitrofurantoin, we developed a
list of the so-called AIDS defining diseases, and that was in 1989.  This
syndrome experienced by a doctor (myself) who was not content with
incomplete and half-way answers was what convinced Piot and his colleagues
to undertake the falsification of lab records.  However, the syndrome did
not progress down to our graves in contradiction to Piot's prophecy, and we
are still robust and energetic and fit to compile this report.


The African AIDS Scenario

The conventional wisdom on AIDS maintains dual epidemiologies and
mechanisms of transmission.  This demarcation seems to delineate along
geographic and racial lines.  The first one is for the USA and Europe,
while the second one is mainly for Africa.  The epidemiological arguments
for infectious HIV claim that AIDS is transmitted in the West through
homosexual activity and by contaminated needles, and in Africa through
heterosexual mechanisms.  This does not make any sense. It only expounds on
the racist nature of authors of AIDS books at the WHO.  It implies that the
HIV discriminate races in choosing its routes of entry.  However, there is
no other germ or virion which behaves in a similar manner, and why the WHO
still sticks to this nonsense is not immediately obvious.  If heterosexual
transmission is efficient in Kampala, it should be equally efficient in New
York.  In fact, it must be more efficient in New York if the magnitude of
promiscuity is any index.  To assume the Africans do sex like rabbits is,
to say the least, unacceptable and racist.  If polio and chicken pox
viruses are not racists, why should HIV be?!  To make the epidemiology of
AIDS more sensible, an alternative etiology must come forth.


The Sugars: An Alternative Etiology for African Immune Depletion

The alcohols fermented from the pentose sugars (ie., furanose, mannose and
arabinose) can trigger the generation of antibodies analogous to those
against the HIV.  The antibodies which the WHO declared as so specific to
confirm HIV infection (ie., gp-160, gp-120, and gp-41) can also be induced
by these alcohols.  Although I went to the WHO in 1991 to protest its
fallacious assumptions, they only threw me into jail.  Now, years later, my
hypothesis is gaining momentum.

My hypothesis arose from the observation that nitrofurantoin could induce

the production of two of the three WHO-declared specific antibodies.  The
main building block of nitrofurantoin is the furanose sugar which the
pharmaceutical companies extract mainly from maize.  It becomes clear that
the above pentose sugars can indeed imitate HIV infection.  They not only
act as causes of false positivity by generating antibodies, but could also
cause full-blown African-specific AIDS symptoms provided they are consumed
chronically.


Nitrofurantoin

Nitrofurantoin is synthesized from furfural, as derived from pentosans
obtained from bran and oat husks and corncobs.  Its toxicology includes the
following "side" effects: nausea, vomiting, drowsiness, headache,
polyneuritis, nystagmus, alopecia, skin rashes, fever, allergic
pneumonitis, megaloblastic anemia, agranulocytosis, hemolytic anemia,
gastro-intestinal problems, lupus-like syndrome, polyneuropathies (muscle
weakness and sensory impairment), cerebral dysfunction, polymyositis,
ganglioneuropathies, intracranial hypertension, etc.  All of these
disturbances function on the basis of autoimmunity, the degree of recovery
from which depends on the severity of symptoms, but with no apparent
relationship to dose.  Chronic or repeated administration of the drug also
augments the degree and variety of side effects, suggesting the increase in
titre of antibodies enhances the attack on the self.  The above suggests
the diseases caused by both nitrofurantoin and claimed HIV are nearly
identical.


Caticalla, Changa, Liga Liga

Caticalla in Ethiopia, Changa in Uganda, and Liga Liga in Tanzania are all
names for the same alcoholic drink made mainly from maize husk-as was the
nitrofurantoin antibiotic.  The furanose sugar is the lowest common factor
in all these drinks, which are locally brewed containing all the furanose
metabolites.  Manitol is the USA counterpart, which is used as a cutting
agent and solvent for injectible heroin and cocaine.  Manitol is the
alcohol form of mannose, another pentosan closely linked to furanose and
arabinose.  It is my hypothesis that these agents are the chief cause of
AIDS and not the HIV.

The French doctors Eveline and Philip Krynen came to similar conclusions
after 4 years of experience with AIDS patients in Uganda.  A group of
researchers from Harvard University and the University of Kinshasa verified
that the LAM (lipoarabinomannan) which is found in the acid fast bacilli
(ie., mycobacterium tuberculosis and mycobacteriumliprae) can induce the
generation of the antibodies gp-160, gp-120 and gp-41.  These are direct
and independent proofs of the relationship between chronic furanose alcohol
consumption, AIDS diseases, and "positivity" on the Western Blot.

Around 1988 the WHO declared that Uganda was the epicentre of HIV
infection, and would be depopulated by the early 1990s.  As of the late
1990s, these predictions have miserably failed, and the Ugandans are not
any worse than the rest of the world.  Moreover, do the Ugandans have sex
like rabbits any more than the rest of the human race?  I know the Ugandans
for I was a medical student at Mekerrere University myself.  They are very
decent people without any aberrant behavior with regard to sex.  They
procreate and fecundate like the reset of the humans on this planet.
However, more than any other population groups, people in this region of
Africa consume maize husk derived alcohols.  Maize, ladies and gentlemen,
is the staple food in the Central African states.


AIDS in My Clinic

For the last 18 months, I have operated a private clinic in Dekemhare,
Eritrea, and have made dramatic experiences with regards to AIDS.  Up to
now, I have had 12 patients who came from Addis Ababa with the confirmed
diagnosis of AIDS.  All were in their terminal stages of their diseases and
they came to die in their home towns.  They had all the cardinal signs and
symptoms of AIDS, such as emaciation, chronic coughs, diarrheal diseases,
dermatitis, etc.

Importantly, these patients gave the history of caticalla consumption for
many years.  With regard to promiscuity, they gave no hints of excessive

practice.  Their partners were all alive with no signs of the disease.
Their serological status was unclear, however.  Three fourths of them (9)
were truck drivers with long stays in Uganda, Kenya, etc.  They told me
that they routinely carried caticalla in their trucks.  Many said they also
knew of colleagues in the same situation elsewhere in East Africa.
When these patients came to their home towns in Eritrea, they could not
find the caticalla they used to drink.  In other words, they got periods of
abstention from their addictions.  The result was 10 out of 12 were quickly
(within 3 months) better and healthy enough to go back to their families in
Addis Ababa.  The other two were irreversibly sick and they succumbed.  The
criteria for "cure" was the gain in weight of more than 10 kilograms, and
the disappearance of the cardinal signs and symptoms stated above.

There also is talk in Asmara, Eritrea, of AIDS confirmed cases with
pulmonary tuberculosis who after treatment of the presenting illness with
tuberculosis medicines, get "cured of AIDS" with dramatic gain in weights
and improvements in other minor ailments.

In the 18 months of clinical experience in Dekemhare, I have never had any
prostitute with AIDS, although there are prostitutes here in great numbers.
This town was one of the main garrisons of the Ethiopian occupying army
five to ten years ago, a population subset naturally heavily promiscuous.
If there is any talk of high prevalence of infection among truck drivers
and prostitutes elsewhere, it is simply because these subgroups also
frequent maize-based alcoholic consumption, and not because of "HIV
infection".

There is a very clear epidemiological difference between Eritrea and
Ethiopia with regard to HIV infection, which is due to variation in the
popularity of caticalla consumption in these countries.  Anybody who
assumes the variation is due to effectiveness of condoms and the like is
miserably mistaken.


Mice: The Asmara Experiment

With the help of professor Afeworki Measho, an immunologist at Asmara
University and the school of veterinary medicine in Asmara, I undertook
experimentation on Mice with nitrofurantoin.  I received 40 mice, separated
them into two groups, one as a control.  I did not have injectable
nitrofurantoin, but only nitrofurantoin macrocrystals in the form of
capsules which were dissolved in sterile water.  The mice were given 50
milligrams intraperitoneally, and observed.  Prior to the experiment, my
expectations were they would develop paralysis, dermatitis, and allergic
pneumonitis.   These three effects are relatively easy to diagnose
clinically in the setting under which the experiment was performed.

The findings were astonishing, in that all the mice under experimentation
developed hind leg paralysis to the point of dragging their hind
legs-complete sensory and motor paralysis occurred in the 48th hour, and
the mice died a few hours later probably because they could not go around
to eat and drink.  About 50 percent developed dermatitis and hair loss,
around the same time they developed the paralysis.  Allergic pneumonitis
was not easy to make out, although I notice flaring of the nostrils with
foamy discharge which was not enough to make a confident diagnosis. I could
not convert the mice serologically because of the lack of an adjuvant in
the kits.

My prediction is, the administration of nitrofurantoin macrocrystals at a
dose of 100 mg along with ceclor 250 mg, four times a day to volunteer
human test subjects for a duration of 7 days, will induce the gp-160,
gp-120 and gp-41 antibodies. (Side effects from nitrofurantoin are more
readily seen in patients with renal dysfunction, which is mimicked by
ceclor administration.)  Allow the immune system a period of 3 weeks to
process the task and test the volunteers immediately after that.  A one
time administration of the above drug sequence as given above will lead to
the presence of antibodies and the patient will be labeled "HIV carrier"
for the rest of his life.  But they won't develop AIDS unless exposed to
repetitive administration of the same.  Repeated administration of the same

dose will deplete the T4 helper cells to such low levels that all the
opportunistic infections will follow.
AIDS: Non-Contagious and Preventable

Contrary to we are told to believe by the AIDS establishment, the disease
is not caused by the HIV or any other microbe.  It means, therefore, AIDS
is not contagious from person to person.  It has nothing to do with sex and
this alleviates the fear from the otherwise pleasurable and physiological
act of sexual activity.  Just imagine what terrible repercussions the
conventional AIDS has had on the normal relationships between humans.  The
diagnosis of AIDS infection has led among other things to suicides,
disintegration of families, loss of jobs, social isolation, upheaval in the
very social fabric, etc.

The prevention and treatment of AIDS now boils down to discontinuation and
abstention of the provocative agents and nothing more.  One time or even a
few times encounter with the agents leads only to the serological presence
of the antibodies which might last for the rest of the life time.  However,
it is only the chronic use of the agents which leads to full-blown AIDS
through the augmentation of the antibody titres.  As stated in more detail
in my larger book and other documentary materials, it is the cross-reaction
of the antibodies with T4 lymphocytes which causes the depletion of the
latter, a key component of true immune deficiency diseases.


+++++++


JD Postscript 2007


Dr. Peter Piot is today the director of the WHO AIDS program, and a strong advocate for "HIV positive" women to not breastfeed their children, for all baby boys world-wide to be genitally-mutilated (circumcised), and apparently also for empowering police to force everyone to carry out such medical dictations. (Not one mainstream health-care or medical organization has objected to such practices, but instead they all seem quite happy about them, and want even more power to jail medical dissenters and disobedient patients.) Perhaps like some other leaders in the "HIV=AIDS=Death" establishment, he also believes dissenters to his fascist ideology should be put into prison.


As I predicted years ago, "AIDS" would become an excuse for pushing of every type of antisexual assault upon humanity, especially upon the sexuality of children and women.  So today, "AIDS Experts" advocate male genital mutilation (circumcision) as well as forbiddance of breastfeeding, telling young children that "sex can kill", empowering social service workers to yank children from excellent parents, and give them into foster homes for daring to defy Medical Power, and a whole raft of quite medical-fascist and antisexual things.  Female genital mutilation cannot be far off as recommendations by the AIDS hysterics, because the same worthless correlation studies which led to their advocacy of male circumcision also suggested female genital mutilations were also correlated with a lowered incidence of AIDS.  The fact that the circumcising Islamic regions tend to be more arid and northerly and forbidding of homemade alcoholic beverages, while the non-circumcising regions are more tropical-southerly and alcohol-consuming, and thereby exposed to more typically African tropical disorders including malaria, TB and leprosy -- all of which cross-react with the typical ELISA and Western Blot "AIDS tests" -- has escaped the "HIV scientists" in their rage-motivated push to use knives on the genitals of boys, and rip babies out of the arms of loving mothers, substituting their toxic "milks" for mother's milk.  These are deeply psychological disorders, which the average person, and certainly the average doctor, has no clue about, but which are fully discussed in my Saharasia book, which speaks to such issues in their global cultural variations.


Parents especially should be forewarned, to stay away from any physician, pediatrician or nurse who embraces orthodox AIDS theory, as if they or their child "tests positive" on one of the bogus "AIDS tests" -- which can cross-react to yield a false-positive due only to the existence of natural and healthy maternal antibodies, or to traces of antibiotics or other environmental stressors -- and they refuse to ingest the toxic medicines demanded by their physician who will then pronounce them "HIV-infected", then they risk that the physicians will call the cops, and use policemen and social workers to have the child forcibly removed from the home and put into a foster-care facility where the "medicines" will be given without parental consent.  Many children have been sickened and even killed through such procedures, but the deaths are always attributed to "virulent HIV"... "we did our very best to save the child"..."if the mother had only cooperated a few weeks earlier"... etc. ad nauseum.   Any physician or nurse pushing the "need for HIV testing" has succumbed to the antisexual hysteria of our day, the white-coat of the MD and their "holier than thou" scientistic wisdom about the "exacting nature of disease and the universe" (don't you hear Handel's chorus in the background!?) being substituted for the black-robe of the old Medieval priest, who also was in direct communication with God, and at one time also administered nostroms in the sick-houses... where people died like flies.  The common functioning principle between these two historical expressions is the hateful and sadistic antisexual, antichild and antifemale impulses which are carried in the emotional structures of the high-caste priests or doctors.  Socially we have exposed the problem within the religious priesthood, whose institutions today are segregated from State Power.  No priest can demand the removal of your child, or policemen forcing you into the church for confessionals, as once was the case in Old Europe.   But this expression is still alive within modern medicine, which does have State Power of all kinds, and many people literally worship at the altar of modern medicine, considering doctors as all-knowing, just as once the priesthood was so considered.  Surely not all physicians fall into this poisonously sick character structure and ideological framework. But the more rational doctors who oppose these trends appear to be a distinct minority, and they have been powerless to oppose it, except by slowly applying softer and more life-positive methods in their practices, and quietly educating their patients and associates.


Interesting that among the signators of the American Declaration of Independence, Dr. Benjamin Rush tried without success to persuade his fellows that the US Constitution should have a provision for the Freedom of Choice in Medicine, just as it provides for such freedoms on religious matters. He knew about the tyranny of the medical profession in Europe, the superstitions and power-drunkenness of those who served the Royal Families, and wanted to protect the United States from their obtaining a monopoly on health care.  He failed, and the war against natural healing methods, the death of Wilhelm Reich in prison, and AIDS hysteria are but a few examples of the outcomes of this failure.








-----------------------------------------------------
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml]

If you find this material of value, please donate to OBRL: http://www.orgonelab.org/donation

Or, purchase books on related subjects from our on-line bookstore: http://www.naturalenergyworks.net

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?