Sunday, November 14, 2010
Verifications of Wilhelm Reich's Bion-Biogenesis Discoveries - New PDF Article, English and Turkish versions
Over the period from 1996 through 2003, OBRL hosted a series of summer laboratory seminars for professionals and students, on the subject of Wilhelm Reich's discovery of the bions, and his related findings on biogenesis, the cancer biopathy, and the Reich blood test. The seminars provided laboratory demonstrations reproducing many of Reich's findings and concepts, and allowed photographic documentation of many of the central phenomenon. The seminars were team-taught by different groups of orgonomic professionals, to include Dr. Richard Blasband, Dr. Stephen Nagy, Dr. Bernard Grad, and Dr. James DeMeo. Many of Reich's central experiments - such as the spontaneous organization of protozoans from disintegrating moss and grass, Reich's incandescence experiments with iron-filings, charcoal and sand, Experiment 6 and Experiment 20, as well as the Reich blood test - were repeatedly reproduced and demonstrated.
At one point, Dr. DeMeo gave a separate presentation on the kinds of observations routinely made at these seminars, with slides, to the Second International Symposium on Pleomorphism held in Ashland, Oregon. His article on this subject "Bion-Biogenesis Research and Seminars at OBRL: Progress Report", appeared in the #5 issue of the OBRL journal Pulse of the Planet, along with related bion-biogenesis articles authored by Dr. Grad and Mr. Maxwell Snyder, along with another on the related bion-like sanal particle discoveries of Bong-Han Kim, as authored by two South Korean professors. Copies of that #5 issue of Pulse - which was also sold as a book with the title Heretic's Notebook: Emotions, Protocells, Ether-Drift and Cosmic Life Energy, with New Research Supporting Wilhelm Reich - are still available for purchase from here:
(listed on the left-hand side - full Table of Contents provided)
This publication stimulated a great interest in the subject of Reich's discoveries, and has been distributed internationally. Most recently, several persons asked when it might be possible to view the original color photomicrographs of bionous materials as made during those seminars, and which appeared in DeMeo's article mostly as only black-and-white images. It was therefore decided to make the "Bion-Biogenesis Research..." article available to the public as a free PDF download. Here:
"Bion-Biogenesis Research and Seminars at OBRL: Progress Report" with color images, by James DeMeo, PhD Download as PDF 1mb.
This same article is also now available as a Turkish translation, OBRL'de Biyon-Biyogenez Arastrmalar ve Seminerler: Ilerleme Raporu, made by Mr. Serdar Çetin of Turkey, available here: Download as PDF 1mb.
Our thanks to Mr. Çetin for volunteering to do the translation.
The attached photo shows growing bions made from iron dust at 5000x magnification. They were created by heating the original iron dust to red-hot incandescence, then plunging into a sterile KCl solution (0.1 N). The solution was autoclaved, and photographed here after 3 months of incubation. See p.103 of the article.
At a later point, it is hoped to place a more complete set of slides from Dr. DeMeo's larger presentation to the Second International Symposium on Pleomorphism onto a video. Watch for future announcements.
Rickets: Side Effect of Solar-UV and Sex-Anxiety Hysteria
For years it has been speculated that the rise in skin cancer today is caused by increasing Solar ultraviolent radiation (UV) exposure. However, this claim is unproven, and attributed to an equally unproven claim the ozone hole has increased in size.
Other lines of argument have been developed, which appear more likely. The increases in skin cancer may be due, instead, to the widespread use of UV-blocking "sunscreen" creams and oils, which people religiously slather all over their skin before going outdoors. This fear-hatred of the Sun has grown to hysterical proportions, to the point where babies are chronically shielded from sunlight, by some misguided parents. And that has public health consequences all by itself.
Since Vitamin D synthesis is dependent upon sunlight, this has led to increases in diseases related to Vitamin D deficiency, among which is Rickets in children. This is a disease typically found in third-world nations suffering from malnutrition, or in Muslim nations among women, where girl-children are chronically shielded from sunlight due to sex-anxiety and constant wearing of body-shielding veils, burkas, chadors, naquibs, and burkas.
Women could endanger their health by wearing burqas
Muslim women in Ireland warned that wearing burqa may cause vitamin D deficiency and related disorders
To underscore the anti-sex hysteria in the Muslim world, about women showing a bit of skin in public, recall the terrible events the last time there was a bathing-beauty contest in the Muslim world. Following newspaper reports on the event, fanatical woman-hating mullahs incited the local young men to riot and burn down newspaper and government offices, Christian churches and other buildings, killing over 100 people. Such violent woman-hating young men are typically the victims of mullah- and male-relative sexual abuse, which is at epidemic levels in the Muslim world. But the Islamic brainwash blames their misery upon women, Jews, foreigners and such -- by scapegoating methods described in Reich's "Mass Psychology of Fascism", except being even more extremist than what he described for the Nazi movement. Young men in any other world culture would be fantastically happy to see pretty girls in bathing suits, but these Muslim guys only wanted to stab them with knives or burn them alive. Not able to get their claws on the young women, they went rioting in the streets, killing any non-Muslim they could get their hands on.
100 Die in Nigerian Riot over Miss World Article
While the women of Islam may be forced to cover up, to save their skins from the violent fanatics in their culture, in the West our "brightest and best" have fanned hysteria about "toxic sunlight" (a lie), and so also push for everyone to "cover up". Part of this Western push has profited the Medical Industry no less, which has provided all sorts of questionable potions to slather on the skin. However, the sun creams which are most effective in blocking UV are filled with heavy metals, the same kinds which we know can cause cancers in people and laboratory animals when ingested. Such heavy-metal ingredients are forbidden in your drinking water, and they create deadly effects in farm animals and field crops. However, the same FDA which burned Reich's books, and today sends SWAT teams to chase after dairy farms selling raw milk cheese, happily allows use of heavy-metal toxins in skin creams! However, the human skin is a highly sensitive and absorbant living surface, which takes in those heavy metals where they accumulate, and then constitute a potential cause for skin disorders, including skin cancer. The heavy metals are also frequently in the nano-particle size range, around 1 micron or smaller, which is the size of Reich's bions, and hence can fairly easily migrate deep into the skin surface, where they linger and cannot be removed by washing.
Sunscreen made with nanoparticles may actually cause skin cancer
This is aside from the problem of increasing rickets among children who are either overly-protected by sun-hysterical parents, or where chubby little kids spend all day watching TV and doing computer games, and so never run around outdoors -- as was the case throughout the history of the human species. We risk to turn our species into something resembling the miserable weak-boned, hairless and disease-prone laboratory mice, living inside self-imposed box-cages under fluorescent lights, staring over hours into Big Brother video screens and eating the processed-food equivalents of Purina rat-chow.
Middle class children suffering rickets
Middle class children in the south of England are suffering from the '17th century disease' rickets as parents cover them in sunscreen and limit time outside in the sunshine, a leading doctor has warned.
Amazing how this kind of thing could happen in the 21st Century, but never underestimate the capacity for the mainstream professionals to act like posturing idiots and come to all the wrong conclusions. It is a good reminder of DeMeo's Axiom: Political, scientific or medical application of a flawed or inaccurate theory leads to social disasters.
PS. Some Practical Considerations
Just for the record, here at OBRL we routinely operate a 15-watt 18" black light fluorescent bulb in a plastic case close to where we use our computers indoors. I normally advise against use of fluorescent lights of any kind, especially the ugly-light CFL bulbs, but make a small exception in this case. A commercial-quality small-wattage black light bulb, if it is housed in a plastic covering, will have only a minimal EM signature, and in nearly all cases will not create the irritating oranur which is typical of most fluorescent light bulbs and fixtures. We use the variety that can be purchased at the "big box" hardware stores. DO NOT use the kind of very short and narrow UV light source that is used by dermatologists or by geologists to create fluorescent reactions on the skin or in mineral specimens, as they give off the shorter-wavelength UV frequencies, which are not healthy in larger doses. ONLY use the kind you can get at a regular hardware store, as shown in the provided photo, and also as identified at the Ace Hardware weblink below. We keep one of these attached to the top of our computer screens. They are kept at arm's length or greater distance, and definitely will ease the eye strain of long work-sessions, and does the same or better job as compared to the usual "Ott Light" or "winter-blues" light, which tend to cost a whole lot more. These are also great for your plants and aquarium, as well as for in your office or workspace, in any environment where natural UV is blocked out by typical window-glass. The frequencies emitted by these commercially-available black-lights range between around 330 to 430 nanometers, which is a part of what the Sun naturally gives us, but which is typically cut out by window-glass and eye-glasses. Ott shows, without those frequencies, people, plants and animals fail to thrive, and frequently show serious illness. He also showed many cases where use of such black-lights created a boost in health of humans and other organisms. Chronic living in low-UV environments leads to sickness, including cancers and other disorders. One becomes rather pasty and dulled in life-energetic quality, trending towards the existence of a cave-cricket or transparent lizard living in the dark underground.
The problem of a UV-deficient environment become especially acute where windows are given specific coatings, or provided with special gasses between the double-panes, to deliberately block out residual UV not already removed by the window-glass itself. The biological sickness induced by UV-avoidance hysteria was all detailed years ago by Dr. John Ott in his documentary video "Exploring the Spectrum". That video is still available as a DVD from our mail-order service, and it is a wonderful Christmas gift. While these UV black light units we use are no substitute for full natural sunlight, they will help against the kinds of problems identified above.
To get the John Ott documentary video, on DVD, go here and look down on the left-hand side:
You can also get a nice low-wattage and desktop-sized UV black-light bulb and fixture, similar to what we use, from Ace Hardware Stores, or other local outlets, or online using this weblink.
In case the above weblink goes dead, as it has occasionally, look for the UV bulb variety with this identification number: F15T8BLB Any standard 18" fluorescent fixture can power it, but look for one specifically at 15 watts made from plastic materials. Don't use the new "curley" black-light fluorescents with screw-in base either, as like all CFLs, they emit considerable radiofrequencies in the microwave spectrum.
If you are an eye-glass wearing person, you want to optimally situate this bulb from 1-2 meters distance, and high enough such that it can shine directly into your eyeball above the top of your glasses. If you wear eye-glasses which fully cover the eye, change to a variety that is more thin and narrow, allowing room-light or outdoor light frequencies to enter above the glass. If you wear contact lenses, I have no advice to give except to change occasionally back to glasses, and then go by what makes the eyes feel best.
As noted above, I typically recommend using clear incandescent light bulbs for all household usage, as they provide the best spectral reproduction of natural sunlight of any light bulb. They are even better than the so-called "full spectrum" incandescent or fluorescent bulbs on the market, which often have a bluish coating to make them appear more natural. Under the spectroscope, however, they are not as solar-appearing as the ordinary clear incandescent. Even the "Ott Light" bulbs sold today, bearing the name of the late Dr. Ott who did all this excellent work on full-spectrum lighting, suffer from this problem, sorry to say. Never use the ugly and radio-frequency emitting CFLs or other long-tube fluorescent fixtures, for the reasons of diminished spectral output, but also and even more primarily due to their low-level electromagnetic power-line, VLF and radiofrequency emissions. Only in the exceptional case of black light bulbs is it recommend using a small fluorescent, which remains only warm to the touch during operations, and never gets overly hot. The incandescent black-light bulbs emit around 90% of their energy as heat, in the thermal infrared, and so they get extremely hot and constitute a potential fire hazard.
Thursday, November 11, 2010
More on TSA abuses, and Nov.24 National Opt-Out Day
This is starting to boil over, and properly so. If you don't want to be treated like a sheep and "subject of the crown", arm-twisted into submission on this and a hundred other things, even while the central causes of the problems they claim to be addressing are deliberately being distorted and ignored, then stand up to TSA bullies and demand decent treatment as a citizen.
Terror subjects CAN be identified by national and religious profiling of high-risk subjects, with isolated screening. This abusive treatment of everyone as a potential terrorist, using methods of dangerous radiation exposures and sexual molestation, has to stop.
Americans line up to join 'no-fly' list
Tolerance maxed out for TSA security's voyeurism, molestation, radiation blasts
Wednesday, November 24, 2010 is NATIONAL OPT-OUT DAY!
Say "I Opt Out."
Should you decide to opt out, you must be aware that the TSA will perform a pat down instead of subjecting you to the WBI/AIT. The TSA may try to pressure you into submitting to the WBI/AIT. You are not required by law to submit to imaging, however, many TSA employees may attempt to intimidate, coerce or insist that it is required. You will need to be firm, and sometimes will not be allowed to opt out unless you state in exactly these words "I opt out." While you should be able to opt out using your own terms, such as requesting a pat down instead, or stating that you will not be photographed nude, remember that not all screeners will be respectful of your decision. They may continue to insist until you say "I opt out." In these cases it is up to the individual traveler to determine whether to stand firm or to use the TSA's preferred wording.
WARNING: Enhanced Pat Down
Be aware that the TSA is using what they call an "enhanced pat down" in many instances. These pat downs are much more rigorous and often include the TSA using their palms to touch your genitals in a manner that could feel like sexual assault. If you feel that you or your child were inappropriately touched during the enhanced pat down, call for a law enforcement officer.
Hotline to report TSA horror stories
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
TSA: Becoming a Dangerous Federal Bully?
Nobody concerned with their health should consent to be screened with the new brand of Transportation Security Administration "naked body" scanning devices, which give off significant ionizing and non-ionizing radiations, anymore than you should consent to being subjected to unnecessary x-rays. When the Airline Pilot's Unions and Flight Attendant's Unions recommend all their members not submit to the machines, but instead to "opt out" (which is the right of everyone, not just the pilots and attendants), then you can appreciate there is a problem, and the "perfectly safe" claims being proffered up by the Feds at Homeland Security are just eye-wash for everyone to "get with the program", no matter what happens to your health.
Also important, when you ask for the "opt out" procedure, demand also that the pat-down be done in a private area, by a same-sex TSA employee, and with a witness, as reports indicate they actually touch and palm-feel over your genitalia and breasts.
It is one thing to be concerned about terrorism on airplanes, which is a real issue. I am concerned about that also. But all this effort to force obedience and scrutiny on ordinary Americans lacking in identifiable terror-background risk factors is being pushed for one reason only: So that they won't have to take the "politically incorrect" step to engage in profiling of passengers who DO have those risk factors in their backgrounds: Ie., people from Muslim nations, women in burkas, men wearing identifiable Hamas beards, or Hezboallah beard and haircut styles, people with passport stamps to Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and so forth. This is being done at the behest also of the Muslim lobby in Washington DC, which carries considerable weight by threats of oil price increases. So YOU must become a slave to Islamic demands of abusive treatments. Just look what happened on PC NPR Radio, when liberal reporter Juan Williams dared to say what everyone knows and privately thinks: "When people in identifiable Muslim garb get on the airplane, it makes me nervous", he dared to publicly say, and was fired with 24 hours by "tolerant" NPR. Meanwhile, there have been many incidents of "dry run" terror plots, and other provocative actions by Muslims in traditional garb, pushing the limits to see how far they can go before being confronted and stopped by fellow passengers or airline security. Actual Muslim terrorists such as the Christmas under-wear bomber, and the Fort Hood shooter, are given exceptional leeway and kind-hearted treatment by the Obama administration -- which has frequently shown itself to be more friendly to Muslim nations than to their fellow Americans -- and won't even in those cases use the word "terrorism".
Also, the growing attitude of Federal Government "security" employees is alarming by itself, as mostly overweight and aggressive Little Men and Women posturing with badges, uniforms, god-like power, and more and more frequently with guns and legal authority to abuse them, is something no free society can tolerate. The more the Fed wants to control your life, the more they must field cops with guns to enforce what you would not willingly consent to. Obama promised early-on to have a civilian police authority in the USA "as big and as well-funded as the US Military" (the MSM did not report that alarming speech, but it is posted widely on YouTube) and so this TSA thing might be one ugly step in that direction.
So, don't be a sheep, and go quietly into these "machines". Opt-out, and demand respectful conduct by the TSA people. Look them in the eye and demand civil treatment. Otherwise, what is today optional at airports will tomorrow become mandatory and then be instituted all over the place, and nobody will be respected by yet another gigantic and very dangerous out-of-control Federal bully.
There are other ways to accomplish the same tasks of screening for likely terrorists without mega-million-dollar sickness-spreading radiation machines, and aggressively perverse bully-boys demanding to feel down into your underwear, literally.
Read and judge for yourself:
American Airlines Pilots in Revolt Against the TSA
Opt Out of a Body Scan? Then Brace Yourself
This will solve the problem: toner and ink cartridges to be banned from U.S.-bound commercial planes
Flier Patience Wears Thin at Checkpoints
Pilots' unions oppose full-body scans, searches
Union president tells US Airways pilots to avoid body scanners
Airport screeners get more aggressive with pat-downs
Flight attendants union upset over new pat-down procedures
Female Radio Talker Handcuffed to Chair, ticket ripped up
Below are some additional details and reports, but from less reliable sources.
World's Pilots Reject Naked Body Scanners Over Radiation Danger, Privacy Breach
TSA Groping Out Of Control
Columbia University: Body Scanners Increase Risk Of Skin Cancer
TSA: No Fondling, Groping Or Squeezing Is Taking Place At Airports
Wednesday, November 03, 2010
Islam's War Against Women
Islam: where 50% of the population lives as chattel slaves, and can be ritually murdered by angry male relatives for showing a spark of independent thought or action.
ISLAM'S WAR ON WOMEN: BULLETIN OF THE OPPRESSION OF WOMEN
The above listing is almost as shocking as the 100x longer listing covering the same period, and maintained at the "Religion of Peace" website. Here, if you haven't visited lately.
A strong brew of truth, fact and reality, most of it censored from mention on the MSM.
Saharasian in pattern and construct, following a 6000 year old pattern which I've already described in exacting, depressing and heart-breaking detail:
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
If you find this material of value, please donate to OBRL:
Or, purchase books on related subjects from our on-line bookstore: