Sunday, April 08, 2007
Nuking American Milk
producers who'd rather not go to the trouble of
keeping foods free of disease-causing contamination,
the FDA may allow labeling of Irradiated foods as
"Pasteurized". Swell, the crap, pus, and
god-knows-what etc will remain but will be
sterilized.
Louis Pasteur did not create or even possibly
industry think about the co-opting of the word
"Pasteurize" to mean Irradiated? Will milk consumers
begin to think their milk is irradiated too?
The irradiation flacks say that the public would be
unduly frightened by irradiation labels. Indeed. We
have millions of people who have been convinced that
the universe is 6000 years old, and we have a system
that can convince the people that what's going on in
Iraq is a "war", that Bush is really president, that
private funded broadcasting is "public", and that
Depleted Uranium is harmless...yet they don't have
media and PR power to make irradiation seem nice and
cozy?? That darn stubborn public.
A bottom line here is that this is mass
experimentation on the public without informed
consent. Irradiation creates changes in the food that
no humans have had a evolutionary chance to adapt to,
if they could in the first place. And there have not
been independent studies to determine the long term
effects of such "foods".
Here's a link to one news story...
http://www.cnn.com/2007/HEALTH/04/03/irradiated.food.ap/index.html
...and a rap on the topic from Food and Water Watch.
FDA Considers Mislabeling Irradiated Food
Wenonah Hauter
that it may allow irradiated food to be mislabeled
with alternate terms such as ëpasteurized.í This move
by FDA would deny consumers clear information about
whether they are buying food that has been exposed to
high doses of ionizing radiation.
acids and other nutrients ñ up to 80 percent of
vitamin A in eggs and half the beta carotene in
orange juice, the FDA has noted.
ìThe proposal is a clear gift to the irradiation
industry, which has been struggling for years. The
request to change labeling rules for irradiated food
is not a new one. In 2002, the Farm Bill instructed
the FDA to re-consider its labeling rules for
bear the radura symbol and a disclosure statement
(ëtreated with irradiationí or ëtreated by
irradiation.í)
ìThe public is no more enthusiastic about changing
the label than about irradiated food itself.
Thousands of Americans submitted comments in
opposition to proposed changes irradiation labels in
1999 and 2002, and polls consistently demonstrate
consumer support for accurate labeling with the word
ëirradiation.í
implementing rules that guarantee that right, not
allowing the meat and irradiation industries to
mislead consumers into buying something they might
otherwise avoid. We urge FDA to abandon this proposed
rule change and will urge consumers to object to the
agencyís dangerous proposal.î
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And here is one way to send your Public Comment on
this issue to the FDA. Don't procrastinate.
-----------------------------------------------------
If you find this material of value, please donate to OBRL:
http://www.orgonelab.org/donation
Or, purchase books on related subjects from our on-line bookstore:
http://www.naturalenergyworks.net
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml]