The flawed and failed HIV theory of AIDS will be abused to push for Mandatory Male Genital Mutilations globally.
The basic thrust of the article below is firstly a tacit admission that the old theory of "infectious HIV" is incorrect. "Heterosexuals are not at risk". This was elucidated scientifically back in the early 1980s, but only WHO and the AIDS-pushers refused to embrace the facts. Now they will refocus upon the risk groups, of homosexual men, IV drug users, and prostitutes (who are often IV drug users). As pointed out years go, however, if "AIDS" was an infectious disorder, it would spread along paths similar to other sexually-transmitted diseases like herpes, syphilis, gonorrhea, etc. and most definitely would require a big effort to educate and change the behavior of everyone, including heterosexuals. Since they admit this is not the case (it never was), it confirms the original criticisms against "infectious HIV", as made by Dr. Peter Duesberg many years ago. That's a separate issue from whether or not HIV even exists as a demonstrable unique entity, a critical point repeatedly made by an even larger group of scientists, as with the "Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV Hypothesis of AIDS". But all of these criticisms have been angrily suppressed, for over 20 years, by both the scientistic medico-magical community and their cadres of mainstream journalist-believers. Such is the nature of so-called "HIV science", that top officials in WHO can get away with this back-stepping, keep their jobs, and not be called on the carpet about it.
But they are not waving the white-flag by any means. They have many more cruel and deadly tricks ready to implement, which will have even worse effects upon everyone, especially heterosexuals, in the years to come.
They will demand that all baby boys be circumcised.
Factually, this new theory demanding Male Genital Mutilations came from the observed spurious correlation of a lowered AIDS incidence in African regions with a higher incidence of penis cutting -- but this is readily understood as the consequence of several unique geographical patterns, which have nothing to do with each other in any functional sense. There are high levels of penis-cutting in dry northern Africa, where Islam prevails and demands male circumcision. In those areas, one does not find the kinds of tropical diseases and parasitical disorders typically found in non-Islamic regions of central and southern Africa. In those latter tropical regions, circumcision incidence is low, but tropical diseases such as malaria, leprosy, typhus, tuberculosis, etc., are at very high levels. So we find increased blood and immune system disorders in the southerly tropical areas of Africa, where the health-care systems are not all that robust towards treatment of such legitimately infectious tropical diseases, where contaminated water is often the only thing that is available, where parasites are abundant -- but also where men have intact penises, keeping their original foreskins.
Add to this the following fact: These same typically African diseases, and the parasites and malnutrition with bad water that often prevails, are documented to create blood antibodies that cross-react with the so-called "HIV tests" to give high levels of false positives. And where the ELISA or Western Blot "HIV tests" are not in use, because they are too expenisve for meagre African health-care budgets, the clinical "Benguai Definition" of AIDS is even worse -- chronic fever, chough and diarrhea -- mixing up confused definitions of AIDs with many other maladies that produce exactly the same thing, Years earlier, such ill Africans with multiple disease exposures and malnutrition were wasting away in what was typically diagnosed as "Slim" disease. But Slim could be treated with good food, good water, typical antibiotics and anti-parasite medicines. When "AIDS" came to become the new fad, those patients were often reacted to with horror, shunned like leppers, disowned by their relatives, and even isolated in special "AIDS wards" in the hospitals where NO medicines were given, of any sort, as they were expected to die. "HIV" is a super-virus, after all, with "no known cure". But Muslims in north Africa, who were geographically lucky enough to live far away from the malaria and tuberculosis regions, and did not drink swamp-water to any significance, did not suffer from things like Slim. This was credited by the WHO AIDS doctors not to what I discuss above, of the opposing geographical patterns, but instead to the point that they ritually sliced off the foreskins of their boy children.*
In short, the sequella of "AIDS" in Africa never had anything to do with a claimed "infectious HIV", but rather it was the product of a bogus and faulty "AIDS tests" and definitions, and other flawed diagnostic criterion which confused ordinary African diseases with the "new WHO definitions for AIDS". HIV is a flawed theory, combined with a bogus blood test and pushed by an arrogant medical community, profiteering pharmaceutical firms, and power-hungry bureaucrats.
Now, WHO does a neat two-step dance, to back away from pushing condoms and safe-sex programs, to now promote yet another bit of official medical quackery, that penis-cutting will "reduce AIDS". It never helped the predominantly-circumcised groups of homosexual men in the USA, who frequented the bath-houses and got sick in high numbers from the various toxic drugs they were ingesting in high quantities (in addition to the overlapping multiple STDs they acquired from unsanitary sexual practices, along with massive antibiotic consumption), nor did it help the IV drug users who continued to inject foreign proteins into their blood, something which produces a giant list of antibodies (as is the case with drug-injecting hemophiliacs) -- with or without clean needles. What's never mentioned in the quack-medicine circles promoting "AIDS" is, that the same correlation studies claiming a reduced incidence of AIDS among male-circumcising cultures, also showed a reduced incidence when they also practiced FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION. Yes, Muslims also slice up the genitalia of their women. So there also is a nice big fat geographical correlation between women with an intact genitalia, and higher levels of tropical diseases, parasites, bad water, etc.
So... all you AIDS Believers, for whom "Doctors Are Gods", get ready for the next New Horror Show of modern "official quackery" white-coat medicine, pushing firstly Male Genital Mutilation world-wide, into places where it never previously existed. Get ready for the numbers of boys being genitally mutilated in the USA and Canada, where it has steadily declined over decades from the hard work by the anti-circumcision movement, to level off and start climbing again. Get ready also for self-righteous proclamations by Muslim fanatics globally, to spread Female Genital Mutilation as an "AIDS Preventative" -- and with the new "hate crimes" laws, you won't be allowed to criticize that, as it will "offend Muslims!" So Female Genital Mutilation can be defended within the West not only as a "cultural practice" which cannot be criticized without being accused of being an "evil racist", etc. -- but it will soon enough gain the blessing of the medical community!
What a Madhouse!
Look also, ten years down the road, for another new admission by WHO, that "the levels of AIDS infections have not yet declined", with some new horrific "solution". Whatever problems there are with authentic immune system disorders, it comes from preventable environmental or lifestyle-linked stressors and pressures, which never had anything to do with "infectious HIV". Such as unsanitary practices, bad drinking water, malnutrition, ingestion of toxic street drugs, or toxic medical drugs, or toxic injection drugs, and so on.
Once again, for the umpteenth time...
A good starting point for articles and discussion is found in the resource list given here:
And the list of exceptionally good and accurate books and DVDs, which provide the facts for all of what I say above, as given here:
James DeMeo, Ph.D.
Threat of world Aids pandemic among heterosexuals is over, report admits
A 25-year health campaign was misplaced outside the continent of Africa. But the disease still kills more than all wars and conflicts
By Jeremy Laurance
A quarter of a century after the outbreak of Aids, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has accepted that the threat of a global heterosexual pandemic has disappeared.
In the first official admission that the universal prevention strategy promoted by the major Aids organisations may have been misdirected, Kevin de Cock, the head of the WHO's department of HIV/Aids said there will be no generalised epidemic of Aids in the heterosexual population outside Africa.
Dr De Cock, an epidemiologist who has spent much of his career leading the battle against the disease, said understanding of the threat posed by the virus had changed. Whereas once it was seen as a risk to populations everywhere, it was now recognised that, outside sub-Saharan Africa, it was confined to high-risk groups including men who have sex with men, injecting drug users, and sex workers and their clients.
Critics of the global Aids strategy complain that vast sums are being spent educating people about the disease who are not at risk, when a far bigger impact could be achieved by targeting high-risk groups and focusing on interventions known to work, such as circumcision, which cuts the risk of infection by 60 per cent, and reducing the number of sexual partners.
But the factors driving HIV were still not fully understood, he said.
Read the whole ridiculous and depressing thing at the weblink above...